16-67375277-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_018296.6(LRRC36):c.1525G>T(p.Gly509Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,460,944 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018296.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_018296.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRRC36 | NM_018296.6 | MANE Select | c.1525G>T | p.Gly509Cys | missense | Exon 10 of 14 | NP_060766.5 | ||
| LRRC36 | NM_001161575.2 | c.1162G>T | p.Gly388Cys | missense | Exon 7 of 11 | NP_001155047.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRRC36 | ENST00000329956.11 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1525G>T | p.Gly509Cys | missense | Exon 10 of 14 | ENSP00000329943.6 | ||
| LRRC36 | ENST00000563189.5 | TSL:1 | c.1162G>T | p.Gly388Cys | missense | Exon 7 of 11 | ENSP00000455103.1 | ||
| LRRC36 | ENST00000565019.6 | TSL:1 | n.*246-38G>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000464675.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1460944Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726838 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at