16-68291300-T-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_003983.6(SLC7A6):c.886T>A(p.Ser296Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00432 in 1,614,184 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 287 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003983.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC7A6 | NM_003983.6 | c.886T>A | p.Ser296Thr | missense_variant | 6/11 | ENST00000219343.11 | |
SLC7A6 | NM_001076785.3 | c.886T>A | p.Ser296Thr | missense_variant | 7/12 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC7A6 | ENST00000219343.11 | c.886T>A | p.Ser296Thr | missense_variant | 6/11 | 1 | NM_003983.6 | P1 | |
ENST00000623181.1 | n.1491A>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0226 AC: 3439AN: 152182Hom.: 153 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00578 AC: 1453AN: 251416Hom.: 56 AF XY: 0.00415 AC XY: 564AN XY: 135872
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00240 AC: 3507AN: 1461884Hom.: 132 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00208 AC XY: 1513AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0227 AC: 3463AN: 152300Hom.: 155 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0222 AC XY: 1654AN XY: 74474
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Apr 16, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at