16-68737423-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.8C>G (p.Pro3Arg) variant has an allele frequency of 0.00025 (39/155276) in gnomAD and is observed in multiple subpopulations, with a maximum frequency of 0.00072 (7/9712) in the European (Finnish) subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant was observed more than 70 probands without a personal history of DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not meet HDGC clinical criteria (BS2; SCV000210891.12, SCV000186617.6). The variant has also been identified in at least 5 individuals with LBC but whose families do not meet HDGC clinical criteria (PMID:20921021, SCV000210891.12). This variant is located in the signal peptide of the E-cadherin pre-protein and would be predicted to impact membrane localization. However, localization to the plasma membrane was not affected when the variant was expressed in cells lacking endogenous expression of E-cadherin (PMID:20921021). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA294410/MONDO:0007648/007

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00021 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

6
13

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:3B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.17
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BS2

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.8C>G p.Pro3Arg missense_variant 1/16 ENST00000261769.10
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.8C>G p.Pro3Arg missense_variant 1/15
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1608C>G 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/16
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1812C>G 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/15

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.8C>G p.Pro3Arg missense_variant 1/161 NM_004360.5 P1P12830-1
CDH1ENST00000422392.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.8C>G p.Pro3Arg missense_variant 1/151 P12830-2
CDH1ENST00000566612.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.8C>G p.Pro3Arg missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 1/151
CDH1ENST00000566510.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.8C>G p.Pro3Arg missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 1/155

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000210
AC:
32
AN:
152218
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000412
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000620
AC:
8
AN:
129088
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000704
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
71060
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000125
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000633
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000417
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000251
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000112
AC:
155
AN:
1381820
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000116
AC XY:
79
AN XY:
682176
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000398
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000102
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000104
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000210
AC:
32
AN:
152218
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000188
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
74364
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000412
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000850
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000453
ExAC
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
4

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:12Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:2Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMar 10, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEuropean Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of PortoAug 01, 2022BS2 (PMID: 30311375) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 06, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Apr 12, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 11, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 27, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 31, 2022Variant summary: CDH1 c.8C>G (p.Pro3Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00024 in 160470 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 8 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. The variant, c.8C>G, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer, ovarian cancer or colorectal cancer (Schrader_2010, Kraus_2017, Yurgelun_2017). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Nine clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (likely benign n=6, VUS n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 06, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 01, 2019This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27616075, 20921021, 25925381) -
Endometrial carcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCentre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre LjubljanaNov 17, 2018This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. The available evidence on this variant's pathogenicity is insufficient or conflicting. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: BP4. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioDec 08, 2022- -
CDH1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 18, 2021This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 17, 2023The c.8C>G (p.Pro3Arg) variant has an allele frequency of 0.00025 (39/155276) in gnomAD and is observed in multiple subpopulations, with a maximum frequency of 0.00072 (7/9712) in the European (Finnish) subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant was observed more than 70 probands without a personal history of DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not meet HDGC clinical criteria (BS2; SCV000210891.12, SCV000186617.6). The variant has also been identified in at least 5 individuals with LBC but whose families do not meet HDGC clinical criteria (PMID: 20921021, SCV000210891.12). This variant is located in the signal peptide of the E-cadherin pre-protein and would be predicted to impact membrane localization. However, localization to the plasma membrane was not affected when the variant was expressed in cells lacking endogenous expression of E-cadherin (PMID: 20921021). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. -
Malignant tumor of breast;C1708349:Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Other:1
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network-Variant interpreted as Likely benign and reported on 11-18-2019 by Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.058
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.39
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.36
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.45
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.60
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.53
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.081
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.65
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.12
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.081
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.0
M;.;.;.;M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.42
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.085
Sift
Uncertain
0.0080
D;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.031
D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.0010
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.59
MutPred
0.47
Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0);
MVP
0.78
MPC
0.92
ClinPred
0.11
T
GERP RS
3.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Varity_R
0.058
gMVP
0.41

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587782484; hg19: chr16-68771326; COSMIC: COSV99028645; API