16-68737423-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.8C>G (p.Pro3Arg) variant has an allele frequency of 0.00025 (39/155276) in gnomAD and is observed in multiple subpopulations, with a maximum frequency of 0.00072 (7/9712) in the European (Finnish) subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant was observed more than 70 probands without a personal history of DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not meet HDGC clinical criteria (BS2; SCV000210891.12, SCV000186617.6). The variant has also been identified in at least 5 individuals with LBC but whose families do not meet HDGC clinical criteria (PMID:20921021, SCV000210891.12). This variant is located in the signal peptide of the E-cadherin pre-protein and would be predicted to impact membrane localization. However, localization to the plasma membrane was not affected when the variant was expressed in cells lacking endogenous expression of E-cadherin (PMID:20921021). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA294410/MONDO:0007648/007
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.8C>G | p.Pro3Arg | missense_variant | 1/16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.8C>G | p.Pro3Arg | missense_variant | 1/15 | NP_001304113.1 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-1608C>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/16 | NP_001304114.1 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-1812C>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/15 | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.8C>G | p.Pro3Arg | missense_variant | 1/16 | 1 | NM_004360.5 | ENSP00000261769.4 | ||
CDH1 | ENST00000422392.6 | c.8C>G | p.Pro3Arg | missense_variant | 1/15 | 1 | ENSP00000414946.2 | |||
CDH1 | ENST00000566612.5 | n.8C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/15 | 1 | ENSP00000454782.1 | ||||
CDH1 | ENST00000566510.5 | n.8C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/15 | 5 | ENSP00000458139.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000620 AC: 8AN: 129088Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000704 AC XY: 5AN XY: 71060
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000112 AC: 155AN: 1381820Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000116 AC XY: 79AN XY: 682176
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000188 AC XY: 14AN XY: 74364
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:2Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 10, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto | Aug 01, 2022 | BS2 (PMID: 30311375) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 06, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jan 06, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 01, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27616075, 20921021, 25925381) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 11, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Apr 12, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 27, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 31, 2022 | Variant summary: CDH1 c.8C>G (p.Pro3Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00024 in 160470 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 8 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. The variant, c.8C>G, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer, ovarian cancer or colorectal cancer (Schrader_2010, Kraus_2017, Yurgelun_2017). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Nine clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (likely benign n=6, VUS n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Endometrial carcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana | Nov 17, 2018 | This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. The available evidence on this variant's pathogenicity is insufficient or conflicting. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: BP4. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Dec 08, 2022 | - - |
CDH1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 18, 2021 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel | Aug 17, 2023 | The c.8C>G (p.Pro3Arg) variant has an allele frequency of 0.00025 (39/155276) in gnomAD and is observed in multiple subpopulations, with a maximum frequency of 0.00072 (7/9712) in the European (Finnish) subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant was observed more than 70 probands without a personal history of DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not meet HDGC clinical criteria (BS2; SCV000210891.12, SCV000186617.6). The variant has also been identified in at least 5 individuals with LBC but whose families do not meet HDGC clinical criteria (PMID: 20921021, SCV000210891.12). This variant is located in the signal peptide of the E-cadherin pre-protein and would be predicted to impact membrane localization. However, localization to the plasma membrane was not affected when the variant was expressed in cells lacking endogenous expression of E-cadherin (PMID: 20921021). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. - |
Malignant tumor of breast;C1708349:Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network | - | Variant interpreted as Likely benign and reported on 11-18-2019 by Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at