16-68737448-G-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BS2BP4BP7

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.33G>C (p.Leu11=) variant results in a synonymous amino acid variant within exon 1. This variant is present at an allele frequency of 0.00012 (18/153328) in gnomAD, with a maximum frequency of 0.00026 (16/60398) in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The variant has been observed in more than 10 individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2). This variant occurs at a nucleotide that is not highly conserved across species and it is not predicted to alter splicing by multiple splice site predictors (BP7, BP4). Although one predictor suggests alteration of an exonic ESE site, the impact of these events has not been well-characterized experimentally. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2, BP4, BP7. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA298941/MONDO:0007648/007

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00053 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.475

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

CDH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

BP7

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

BS2

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5 link	c.33G>C	p.Leu11Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 16	ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1	P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317184.2 link	c.33G>C	p.Leu11Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 15		NP_001304113.1	P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317185.2 link	c.-1583G>C		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 1 of 16		NP_001304114.1	P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1	NM_001317186.2 link	c.-1787G>C		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 1 of 15		NP_001304115.1	P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10 link	c.33G>C	p.Leu11Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 16	1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769.4	P12830-1
CDH1	ENST00000422392.6 link	c.33G>C	p.Leu11Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 15	1		ENSP00000414946.2	P12830-2
CDH1	ENST00000566612.5 link	n.33G>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 15	1		ENSP00000454782.1	H3BNC6
CDH1	ENST00000566510.5 link	n.33G>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 15	5		ENSP00000458139.1	H3BVI7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000197

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000965

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000353

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000102

AC:

AN:

126878

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000129

AC XY:

AN XY:

70012

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000231

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000512

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000530

AC:

733

AN:

1383490

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000555

AC XY:

379

AN XY:

683194

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000637

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000664

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000242

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000197

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000161

AC XY:

AN XY:

74330

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000965

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000353

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000234

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000196

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:15

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:6

Jan 02, 2018

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The CDH1 c.33G>C (p.Leu11Leu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect ESE sites. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 18/153328 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.000265 (16/60398). This frequency is about 9 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CDH1 variant (0.0000283), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Non-Finnish) origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likely benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 10, 2017

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 25, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 25, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Sep 10, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The CDH1 p.Leu11= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the MutDB or Zhejiang University databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs730881654 as "With other allele") and ClinVar (1x as benign by GeneDx; 6x as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae, Color Genomics, and three other clinical laboratories; and 2x as uncertain significance by Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America). The variant was identified in control databases in 18 of 153328 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0001 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 13794 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007), Other in 1 of 4418 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), and European in 16 of 60398 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), while the variant was not observed in the Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Leu11= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and only 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Feb 01, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Jul 27, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 19, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Aug 29, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Benign:2

Nov 28, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 26, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Aug 17, 2023

ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

The c.33G>C (p.Leu11=) variant results in a synonymous amino acid variant within exon 1. This variant is present at an allele frequency of 0.00012 (18/153328) in gnomAD, with a maximum frequency of 0.00026 (16/60398) in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The variant has been observed in more than 10 individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2). This variant occurs at a nucleotide that is not highly conserved across species and it is not predicted to alter splicing by multiple splice site predictors (BP7, BP4). Although one predictor suggests alteration of an exonic ESE site, the impact of these events has not been well-characterized experimentally. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2, BP4, BP7. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.79

CADD

Benign

8.5

DANN

Benign

0.66

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over