16-68738327-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 1P and 0B. PM2_Supporting

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.79C>T (p.Pro27Ser) variant has allele frequency <1 out of 100, 000 in the gnomAD cohort (1/156646 in gnomAD v2.1.1; PM2_Supporting). No additional evidence met criteria for consideration. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): PM2_Supporting. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA10583401/MONDO:0007648/007

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000029 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance reviewed by expert panel U:8B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.41
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.

PM2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkc.79C>T p.Pro27Ser missense_variant Exon 2 of 16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1 P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkc.79C>T p.Pro27Ser missense_variant Exon 2 of 15 NP_001304113.1 P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkc.-1537C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 2 of 16 NP_001304114.1 P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkc.-1741C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 2 of 15 NP_001304115.1 P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkc.79C>T p.Pro27Ser missense_variant Exon 2 of 16 1 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769.4 P12830-1
CDH1ENST00000422392.6 linkc.79C>T p.Pro27Ser missense_variant Exon 2 of 15 1 ENSP00000414946.2 P12830-2
CDH1ENST00000566612.5 linkn.79C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 15 1 ENSP00000454782.1 H3BNC6
CDH1ENST00000566510.5 linkn.79C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 15 5 ENSP00000458139.1 H3BVI7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000638
AC:
1
AN:
156646
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000121
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
82560
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000165
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000287
AC:
4
AN:
1395484
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00000436
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
688240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000371
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:3
Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 27 of the CDH1 protein (p.Pro27Ser). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with gastric cancer and/or breast cancer (PMID: 26182300, 35264596). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 239913). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function outputs the following: PolyPhen-2: "Benign". The serine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Aug 01, 2022
European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

PM2 (PMID: 30311375) -

Jul 02, 2018
Mendelics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:2
Nov 20, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 25, 2022
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26182300, 27720647) -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Feb 18, 2025
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This missense variant replaces proline with serine at codon 27 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with HDGC-associated cancer and in a related unaffected individual (PMID: 26182300). This variant has been identified in 4/1539850 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Sep 21, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Aug 21, 2023
ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method: curation

The c.79C>T (p.Pro27Ser) variant has allele frequency <1 out of 100, 000 in the gnomAD cohort (1/156646 in gnomAD v2.1.1; PM2_Supporting). No additional evidence met criteria for consideration. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): PM2_Supporting. -

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Mar 05, 2024
Baylor Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.088
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.15
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.92
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.43
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.85
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.71
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.42
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.69
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.021
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.22
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L;.;.;.;L
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.1
N;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.098
Sift
Benign
0.27
T;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.73
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.044
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.32
MutPred
0.55
Loss of catalytic residue at P27 (P = 1e-04);Loss of catalytic residue at P27 (P = 1e-04);Loss of catalytic residue at P27 (P = 1e-04);Loss of catalytic residue at P27 (P = 1e-04);Loss of catalytic residue at P27 (P = 1e-04);
MVP
0.71
MPC
0.27
ClinPred
0.090
T
GERP RS
1.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.6
Varity_R
0.092
gMVP
0.35

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs878854696; hg19: chr16-68772230; API