16-68801806-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 1P and 5B. BP4PM2_SupportingBS2
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.300C>G variant (NM_004360.5) is a synonymous (silent) variant (p.Val100=) that is not predicted by SpliceAI, varSEAK, to impact splicing (BP4). Although this variant is absent in gnomAD v2.1.1 and v3.1 (PM2_Supporting), it has been observed in more than 10 heterozygous individuals with no DCG, SRC tumours, or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; Ambry Genetics, Invitae, University of Washington). In summary, although there are both pathogenic and benign types of evidence for this variant, the CDH1 VCEP classified the variant as likely benign for DGLBCS based on BS2 alone. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 05/06/2022) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA188969/MONDO:0100488/007
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.300C>G | p.Val100= | synonymous_variant | 3/16 | ENST00000261769.10 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.300C>G | p.Val100= | synonymous_variant | 3/15 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-1316C>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 3/16 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-1520C>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 3/15 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.300C>G | p.Val100= | synonymous_variant | 3/16 | 1 | NM_004360.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000821 AC: 12AN: 1461860Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 727226
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 06, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Dec 01, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Sep 21, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 24, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 28, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel | Aug 02, 2023 | The c.300C>G variant (NM_004360.5) is a synonymous (silent) variant (p.Val100=) that is not predicted by SpliceAI, varSEAK, to impact splicing (BP4). Although this variant is absent in gnomAD v2.1.1 and v3.1 (PM2_Supporting), it has been observed in more than 10 heterozygous individuals with no DCG, SRC tumours, or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; Ambry Genetics, Invitae, University of Washington). In summary, although there are both pathogenic and benign types of evidence for this variant, the CDH1 VCEP classified the variant as likely benign for DGLBCS based on BS2 alone. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 05/06/2022) - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at