16-68801876-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.370C>T (p.Arg124Cys) missense variant has a frequency of 0.039% in South Asians (12/30610 alleles) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort. This variant has been observed in ≥10 (62) individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; PMID:30287823, SCV000288481.8, SCV000661624.3). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as of likely benign based the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA8129836/MONDO:0007648/007

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000032 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

4
15

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:6B:4O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.02
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BS2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.370C>T p.Arg124Cys missense_variant 3/16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.370C>T p.Arg124Cys missense_variant 3/15 NP_001304113.1
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1246C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 3/16 NP_001304114.1
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1450C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 3/15 NP_001304115.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.370C>T p.Arg124Cys missense_variant 3/161 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769 P1P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152212
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000598
AC:
15
AN:
250704
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000885
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
135550
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000995
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000322
AC:
47
AN:
1461246
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000468
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
726970
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000126
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000720
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152212
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74344
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000113
ExAC
AF:
0.0000494
AC:
6

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:4Other:2
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:4Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 03, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network-Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 01-24-2021 by Lab Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJul 12, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpNov 07, 2023This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 124 of the CDH1 protein (p.Arg124Cys). This variant is present in population databases (rs748086082, gnomAD 0.04%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 30287823). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 239905). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jan 04, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 09, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 18, 2022- -
not provided Uncertain:1Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 24, 2022In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with breast cancer, but also in unaffected controls (Momozawa et al., 2018); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15235021, 30287823) -
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect, ClinGen-Variant classified as Uncertain significance and reported on 11-03-2022 by Lab or GTR ID 506138. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 29, 2022Variant summary: CDH1 c.370C>T (p.Arg124Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6e-05 in 250704 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00039 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 14 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c.370C>T has been reported in the literature as a VUS found in cases and unaffected controls in settings of multigene panel testing among germline and tumors of individuals with unspecified/bilateral breast cancer respectively (example, Momozawa_2018 Fountzilas_2016). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with CDH1-related Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer/Lobular Breast Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 10, 2023The c.370C>T (p.Arg124Cys) missense variant has a frequency of 0.039% in South Asians (12/30610 alleles) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort. This variant has been observed in at least 10 (62) individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; PMID: 30287823, SCV000288481.8, SCV000661624.3). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as of likely benign based the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.30
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.62
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.50
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.71
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.78
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.57
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.81
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.19
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.14
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.3
L;.;.;.;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.19
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.0
N;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.20
Sift
Uncertain
0.025
D;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.038
D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.98
D;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.40
MutPred
0.35
Loss of disorder (P = 0.0293);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0293);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0293);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0293);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0293);
MVP
0.74
MPC
0.76
ClinPred
0.14
T
GERP RS
1.7
Varity_R
0.067
gMVP
0.25

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs748086082; hg19: chr16-68835779; COSMIC: COSV99932788; API