16-68801883-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2_Supporting

The NM_001317185.2(CDH1):​c.-1239C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000186 in 1,613,478 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000017 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_001317185.2 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.200
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.07634199).
BP6
Variant 16-68801883-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68801883-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 184629.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=9}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 5 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkc.377C>T p.Pro126Leu missense_variant Exon 3 of 16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1 P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkc.377C>T p.Pro126Leu missense_variant Exon 3 of 16 1 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769.4 P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000239
AC:
6
AN:
250648
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135538
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000884
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000171
AC:
25
AN:
1461282
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000179
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
726990
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000810
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000404
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74334
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000108
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000113
ExAC
AF:
0.0000247
AC:
3
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:3Benign:1
May 29, 2018
Counsyl
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 06, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -

Aug 01, 2022
European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

BS2_Supporting (PMID: 30311375) -

Nov 27, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:3
Oct 13, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 09, 2021
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in an individual with colorectal cancer who also carried a pathogenic variant in MSH2 (Ricker 2017); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31871109, 28640387) -

Feb 04, 2024
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The CDH1 c.377C>T (p.Pro126Leu) variant has been reported in the published literature in an individual with breast cancer (PMID: 31871109 (2019)), and in another individual with colorectal cancer who also carried a pathogenic variant in the MSH2 gene (PMID: 28640387 (2017)). In a breast cancer association study, this variant was observed in a reportedly healthy individual (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000098 (3/30610 chromosomes in South Asian subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Dec 05, 2023
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This missense variant replaces proline with leucine at codon 126 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 31871109) and colorectal cancer (PMID: 28640387). In a large breast cancer case-control study, this variant has been reported in 0/60466 cases and 1/53461 unaffected controls (PMID: 33471991). This variant has also been identified in 9/282034 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Jul 08, 2021
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C0476089:Endometrial carcinoma;C0919267:Ovarian neoplasm;C1708349:Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma;C4551988:Blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Oct 31, 2018
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
May 01, 2019
Cancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.064
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.30
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.46
CADD
Benign
1.0
DANN
Benign
0.64
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.50
D;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.7
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.7
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.035
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.57
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.016
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.076
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L;.;.;.;L
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.7
N;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.058
Sift
Benign
0.19
T;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.30
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.30
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.15
MVP
0.57
MPC
0.26
ClinPred
0.019
T
GERP RS
-1.8
Varity_R
0.014
gMVP
0.12

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs746703615; hg19: chr16-68835786; API