16-68810193-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.688-4T>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000496 in 1,614,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.688-4T>C | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.688-4T>C | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | NP_001304113.1 | ||||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-928-4T>C | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | NP_001304114.1 | ||||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-1132-4T>C | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.688-4T>C | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_004360.5 | ENSP00000261769.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000795 AC: 2AN: 251438Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135886
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461854Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74366
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 08, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 19, 2017 | Variant summary: The CDH1 c.688-4T>C variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant was found in the control population dataset of gnomAD in 2/246212 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0000081, which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CDH1 variant (0.0000283). The variant has been reported in the literature, without strong evidence for causality (Yorczyk_2015). One clinical diagnostic laboratory classified this variant as uncertain significance and one as likely benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as VUS. - |
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 09, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Sep 13, 2024 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 16, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 26, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at