16-68810303-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM1BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.794A>T(p.Glu265Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000149 in 1,613,990 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/23 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.794A>T | p.Glu265Val | missense_variant | 6/16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.794A>T | p.Glu265Val | missense_variant | 6/15 | NP_001304113.1 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-822A>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 6/16 | NP_001304114.1 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-1026A>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 6/15 | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.794A>T | p.Glu265Val | missense_variant | 6/16 | 1 | NM_004360.5 | ENSP00000261769.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5AN: 251456Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135898
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000157 AC: 23AN: 1461820Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000124 AC XY: 9AN XY: 727216
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 05, 2023 | This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 265 of the CDH1 protein (p.Glu265Val). This variant is present in population databases (rs587782728, gnomAD 0.004%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CDH1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142802). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. RNA analysis performed to evaluate the impact of this missense change on mRNA splicing indicates it does not significantly alter splicing (Invitae). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 05, 2023 | This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with valine at codon 265 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has been identified in 5/251456 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 15, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 30, 2024 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15235021, 22850631) - |
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Jan 06, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at