16-68810317-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BS2BA1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.808T>G (p.Ser270Ala) variant has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.002269 (0.2269%, 57 of 25124 alleles) in the European (Finnish) subpopulation of the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort (BA1). This variant has also has been observed in more than 10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000185687.6, SCV000254832.8). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign based the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BA1, BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA294235/MONDO:0007648/007
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
- cleft soft palateInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- orofacial cleft 3Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- blepharocheilodontic syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.808T>G | p.Ser270Ala | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |
| CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.808T>G | p.Ser270Ala | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 15 | NP_001304113.1 | ||
| CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-808T>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 6 of 16 | NP_001304114.1 | |||
| CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-1012T>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 6 of 15 | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000349 AC: 53AN: 152022Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000338 AC: 85AN: 251452 AF XY: 0.000316 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000174 AC: 255AN: 1461810Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000165 AC XY: 120AN XY: 727210 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000349 AC: 53AN: 152022Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000417 AC XY: 31AN XY: 74264 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1Benign:5Other:1
BS2 (PMID: 30311375) -
- -
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
- -
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
- -
This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
- -
- -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Benign:3
Variant summary: CDH1 c.808T>G (p.Ser270Ala) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the second cadherin repeat (IPR002126) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00044 in 282828 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0023 within the Finnish subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Finnish control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 80 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Finnish origin. c.808T>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with gastric cancer and breast/ovary cancer (e.g. Ikonen 2001, Brovkina 2018). These reports however, do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. At least one publication reported experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, demonstarating that the variant resulted in a strong adhesion but a bit lower than that of WT, the effect on cell migration in a wound closure assay was similar to WT, however, the variant protein was not activatable in CHO cells (Petrova 2016). The significance of these results at the cellular level remains however unclear. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (4 classifying it as likely benign, and 1 as a VUS). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:2
- -
In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26182300, 11948460, 19725995, 17545690, 11705864, 22098830, 27582386, 29928469, 30333958, 32426482) -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:2
- -
The c.808T>G (p.Ser270Ala) variant has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.002269 (0.2269%, 57 of 25124 alleles) in the European (Finnish) subpopulation of the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort (BA1). This variant has also has been observed in more than 10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000185687.6, SCV000254832.8). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign based the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BA1, BS2. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at