16-68810317-T-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BS2BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.808T>G (p.Ser270Ala) variant has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.002269 (0.2269%, 57 of 25124 alleles) in the European (Finnish) subpopulation of the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort (BA1). This variant has also has been observed in more than 10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000185687.6, SCV000254832.8). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign based the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BA1, BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA294235/MONDO:0007648/007

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00035 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00017 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:14O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.27

Publications

22 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
CDH1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
  • cleft soft palate
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • orofacial cleft 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • blepharocheilodontic syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

BS2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkc.808T>G p.Ser270Ala missense_variant Exon 6 of 16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1 P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkc.808T>G p.Ser270Ala missense_variant Exon 6 of 15 NP_001304113.1 P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkc.-808T>G 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 6 of 16 NP_001304114.1 P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkc.-1012T>G 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 6 of 15 NP_001304115.1 P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkc.808T>G p.Ser270Ala missense_variant Exon 6 of 16 1 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769.4 P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000349
AC:
53
AN:
152022
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000242
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000368
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000479
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000338
AC:
85
AN:
251452
AF XY:
0.000316
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00217
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000273
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000174
AC:
255
AN:
1461810
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000165
AC XY:
120
AN XY:
727210
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00241
AC:
129
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000103
AC:
115
AN:
1111936
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000182
AC:
11
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16
32
47
63
79
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000349
AC:
53
AN:
152022
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000417
AC XY:
31
AN XY:
74264
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000242
AC:
1
AN:
41384
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15254
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00245
AC:
26
AN:
10598
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
314
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000368
AC:
25
AN:
68004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000479
AC:
1
AN:
2086
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.516
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
8
11
14
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000388
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000340
ExAC
AF:
0.000371
AC:
45
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:14Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1Benign:5Other:1
Aug 01, 2022
European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BS2 (PMID: 30311375) -

Jan 31, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 23, 2018
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

-
Laboratório de Genética Humana e Médica, Universidade Federal do Pará
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 06, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Mar 17, 2016
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2022
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Aug 22, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified Benign:3
Feb 01, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: CDH1 c.808T>G (p.Ser270Ala) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the second cadherin repeat (IPR002126) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00044 in 282828 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0023 within the Finnish subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Finnish control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 80 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Finnish origin. c.808T>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with gastric cancer and breast/ovary cancer (e.g. Ikonen 2001, Brovkina 2018). These reports however, do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. At least one publication reported experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, demonstarating that the variant resulted in a strong adhesion but a bit lower than that of WT, the effect on cell migration in a wound closure assay was similar to WT, however, the variant protein was not activatable in CHO cells (Petrova 2016). The significance of these results at the cellular level remains however unclear. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (4 classifying it as likely benign, and 1 as a VUS). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 16, 2025
Laboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Sep 19, 2020
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 13, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26182300, 11948460, 19725995, 17545690, 11705864, 22098830, 27582386, 29928469, 30333958, 32426482) -

CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:2
Aug 19, 2020
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 17, 2023
ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

The c.808T>G (p.Ser270Ala) variant has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.002269 (0.2269%, 57 of 25124 alleles) in the European (Finnish) subpopulation of the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort (BA1). This variant has also has been observed in more than 10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000185687.6, SCV000254832.8). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign based the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BA1, BS2. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.28
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.19
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.31
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.21
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.22
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.25
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.70
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.030
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.025
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.77
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.3
L;.;.;.;L
PhyloP100
2.3
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.1
N;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.29
Sift
Benign
0.082
T;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.094
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.25
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.33
MVP
0.80
MPC
0.52
ClinPred
0.064
T
GERP RS
5.2
Varity_R
0.18
gMVP
0.21
Mutation Taster
=10/90
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587776399; hg19: chr16-68844220; API