Menu
GeneBe

16-68811717-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.866C>T (p.Ala289Val) missense variant has a frequency of 0.00002 (6 of 251,472) in gnomAD, with a maximum allele frequency of 0.00010 (3 of 30,616) in the South Asian subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in ≥10 individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000669016.2, SCV000254833.6). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as of likely benign based the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA336712/MONDO:0007648/007

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

7
12

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.945
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BS2

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.866C>T p.Ala289Val missense_variant 7/16 ENST00000261769.10
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.866C>T p.Ala289Val missense_variant 7/15
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-750C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 7/16
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-954C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 7/15

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.866C>T p.Ala289Val missense_variant 7/161 NM_004360.5 P1P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000239
AC:
6
AN:
251472
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000294
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135908
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000109
AC:
16
AN:
1461882
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000151
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000899
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 29, 2023This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 289 of the CDH1 protein (p.Ala289Val). This variant is present in population databases (rs780399325, gnomAD 0.01%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 30287823). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 216597). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEuropean Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of PortoAug 01, 2022BS2 (PMID: 30311375) -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 17, 2023The c.866C>T (p.Ala289Val) missense variant has a frequency of 0.00002 (6 of 251,472) in gnomAD, with a maximum allele frequency of 0.00010 (3 of 30,616) in the South Asian subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in at least 10 individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000669016.2, SCV000254833.6). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as of likely benign based the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 11, 2024This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.19
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.31
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.49
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.36
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.42
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.18
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.68
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.029
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.59
D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.88
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
M;.;.;.;M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.38
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.7
D;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.15
Sift
Uncertain
0.012
D;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.049
D;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.59
P;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.60
MutPred
0.66
Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0522);Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0522);Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0522);Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0522);Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0522);
MVP
0.79
MPC
0.33
ClinPred
0.17
T
GERP RS
2.6
Varity_R
0.31
gMVP
0.59

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs780399325; hg19: chr16-68845620; COSMIC: COSV55733357; COSMIC: COSV55733357; API