16-68812146-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1020G>A(p.Thr340Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000145 in 1,614,084 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 3 hom. )
Consequence
CDH1
NM_004360.5 synonymous
NM_004360.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.35
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
Variant 16-68812146-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68812146-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 182380.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-68812146-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-68812146-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.35 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000146 (214/1461834) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00282 (112/39700). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0024. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 120 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 20 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.1020G>A | p.Thr340Thr | synonymous_variant | 8/16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.1020G>A | p.Thr340Thr | synonymous_variant | 8/15 | NP_001304113.1 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-596G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 8/16 | NP_001304114.1 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-800G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 8/15 | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.1020G>A | p.Thr340Thr | synonymous_variant | 8/16 | 1 | NM_004360.5 | ENSP00000261769.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
152132
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000231 AC: 58AN: 251488Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000272 AC XY: 37AN XY: 135918
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
58
AN:
251488
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
135918
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000146 AC: 214AN: 1461834Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000165 AC XY: 120AN XY: 727220
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
214
AN:
1461834
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
120
AN XY:
727220
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152250Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74450
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
152250
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
74450
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 06, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 12, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto | Aug 01, 2022 | BS1; BP2 (PMID: 30311375) - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 04, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 08, 2016 | Variant summary: The CDH1 c.1020G>A (p.Thr340Thr) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. Mutation taster predicts a damaging outcome for this variant while splice prediction tools indicate the variant not to have an impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 22/121410 control chromosomes (1 homozygote), predominantly observed in the East Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.00104 (9/8654). This frequency is about 37 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CDH1 variant (0.0000283), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of East Asian origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 07, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 01, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 09, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 11, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 28, 2015 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Apr 29, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at