16-68812265-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PVS1_StrongPM5_SupportingPS4_SupportingPM2_Supporting
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: This c.1137+2T>C variant occurs at the canonical donor splice site of exon 8 (PVS1_strong, PM5_Supporting). This variant is absent from populations in gnomAD (PM2_Supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) and has been observed in at least one individual meeting IGCLC criteria for HDGC (PS4_supporting; internal laboratory data). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely pathogenic based on ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: PVS1_strong, PM2_Supporting, PS4_supporting, PM5_Supporting (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA194301/MONDO:0007648/007
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 splice_donor
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.1137+2T>C | splice_donor_variant | ENST00000261769.10 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.1137+2T>C | splice_donor_variant | ||||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-479+2T>C | splice_donor_variant | ||||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-683+2T>C | splice_donor_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.1137+2T>C | splice_donor_variant | 1 | NM_004360.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:2
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 08, 2014 | The c.1137+2T>C intronic variant results from a T to C substitution two nucleotides after coding exon 8 in the CDH1 gene. This variant was not reported in population based cohorts in the following databases: Database of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (dbSNP), NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP), and 1000 Genomes Project. In the ESP, this variant was not observed in 6498 samples (12996 alleles) with coverage at this position. To date, this alteration has been detected with an allele frequency of approximately 0.002% (greater than 45000 alleles tested) in our clinical cohort (includes this individual).This nucleotide position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. Using the MaxEntScan, BDGP, and ESEfinder splice site prediction tools, this alteration is predicted to abolish the native donor splice site; however, direct evidence is unavailable. Alterations that disrupt the canonical splice donor site are typically deleterious in nature (ACMG Recommendations for Standards for Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variations. Revision 2007. Genet Med. 2008;10:294). As such, the c.1137+2T>C variant is classified as likely pathogenic. - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 26, 2020 | This variant causes a T to C nucleotide substitution at the canonical +2 position of intron 8 splice donor site of the CDH1 gene. Splice site prediction tools predict that this variant may have a significant impact on RNA splicing. Although functional studies have not been reported for this variant, this variant is expected to result in an absent or non-functional protein product. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 31296550). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). A different variant affecting the same splice donor site c.1137+1G>A is known to be disease-causing (Clinvar variation ID: 233979). Loss of CDH1 function is a known mechanism of disease (clinicalgenome.org). Based on the available evidence, this variant is classified as Likely Pathogenic. - |
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2020 | This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change affects a donor splice site in intron 8 of the CDH1 gene. It is expected to disrupt RNA splicing and likely results in an absent or disrupted protein product. Disruption of this splice site has been observed in individuals with diffuse gastric cancer (PMID: 10477433, Invitae). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 186267). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. Donor and acceptor splice site variants typically lead to a loss of protein function (PMID: 16199547), and loss-of-function variants in CDH1 are known to be pathogenic (PMID: 15235021, 20373070). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site, but this prediction has not been confirmed by published transcriptional studies. - |
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel | Oct 23, 2023 | This c.1137+2T>C variant occurs at the canonical donor splice site of exon 8 (PVS1_strong, PM5_Supporting). This variant is absent from populations in gnomAD (PM2_Supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) and has been observed in at least one individual meeting IGCLC criteria for HDGC (PS4_supporting; internal laboratory data). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely pathogenic based on ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: PVS1_strong, PM2_Supporting, PS4_supporting, PM5_Supporting (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at