16-68813471-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1296C>T(p.Asn432Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000403 in 1,614,146 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000034 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.66

Publications

6 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

CDH1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
hereditary breast carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
cleft soft palate
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
orofacial cleft 3
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
blepharocheilodontic syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
familial ovarian cancer
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

CDH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).

BP6

Variant 16-68813471-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68813471-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 185290.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.66 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 16 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5 link	c.1296C>T	p.Asn432Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 16	ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10 link	c.1296C>T	p.Asn432Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 16	1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00123

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000517

AC:

AN:

251484

AF XY:

0.0000294

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000416

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000335

AC:

AN:

1461860

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000330

AC XY:

AN XY:

727234

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000597

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000671

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000543

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000989

AC:

AN:

1111984

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000497

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.488

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152286

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74452

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41566

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000654

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5174

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4818

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00123

AC:

AN:

10606

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.497

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000189

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Dec 11, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jun 12, 2017

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 15, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Jul 30, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 03, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma

Benign:2

Nov 22, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 18, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Nov 06, 2020

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

CDH1-related disorder

Benign:1

Dec 20, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided

Benign:1

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The CDH1 p.Asn432= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the databases. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs187862045) as "With Likely benign, Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics and Color). The variant was identified in control databases in 17 of 277234 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00006 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 1 of 6466 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 2 of 34420 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), Finnish in 14 of 25794 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), while the variant was not observed in the African, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and South Asian populations. The p.Asn432= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.67

CADD

Benign

1.8

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.79

PhyloP100

-2.7

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over