16-68815586-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2_Supporting
The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1392C>T(p.Val464=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000415 in 1,614,100 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V464V) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.1392C>T | p.Val464= | synonymous_variant | 10/16 | ENST00000261769.10 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.1209C>T | p.Val403= | synonymous_variant | 9/15 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-157C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 10/16 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-428C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 10/15 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.1392C>T | p.Val464= | synonymous_variant | 10/16 | 1 | NM_004360.5 | P1 | |
ENST00000563916.1 | n.337G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/3 | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5AN: 251488Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135918
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000417 AC: 61AN: 1461874Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000468 AC XY: 34AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74366
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 07, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 08, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto | Aug 01, 2022 | BP7 (PMID: 30311375) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 08, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 28, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Sep 16, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at