16-68815759-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BS2BP2_Strong

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The NM_004360.5(CDH1): c.1565C>T (p.Thr522Ile) variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). This variant was observed in the homozygous state in 1 individual without personal and/or family history of DGC, LBC, or SRC tumors (BP2_strong; internal laboratory contributors). This variant is known in one family with HDGC criteria (ERN_GENTURIS). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as benign based on BS2 and BP2_strong. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS2, BP2_strong. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 06/26/2023) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA337526/MONDO:0100488/007

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0000075 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
ENST00000261769.10 missense, splice_region

Scores

9
10
Splicing: ADA: 0.1037
2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:6B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.463
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BS2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1565C>T p.Thr522Ile missense_variant, splice_region_variant 10/16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1382C>T p.Thr461Ile missense_variant, splice_region_variant 9/15 NP_001304113.1
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.17C>T p.Thr6Ile missense_variant, splice_region_variant 10/16 NP_001304114.1
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-255C>T splice_region_variant, 5_prime_UTR_variant 10/15 NP_001304115.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1565C>T p.Thr522Ile missense_variant, splice_region_variant 10/161 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769 P1P12830-1
ENST00000563916.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.264-100G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152188
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000796
AC:
2
AN:
251328
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000147
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135850
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000752
AC:
11
AN:
1461854
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00000825
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
727226
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000450
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000497
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152188
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74332
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:3
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 03, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEuropean Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de InvestigaĆ§Ć£o e InovaĆ§Ć£o em SaĆŗde, University of PortoAug 01, 2022PS4_Supporting; PM2 (PMID: 30311375) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMar 17, 2016- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 08, 2023The p.T522I variant (also known as c.1565C>T), located in coding exon 10 of the CDH1 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 1565. The amino acid change results in threonine to isoleucine at codon 522, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration was observed in with an allele frequency of 0.00009 in 11241 female controls and was not observed in 7051 unselected female breast cancer patients of Japanese ancestry (Momozawa Y et al. Nat Commun, 2018 10;9:4083). This alteration was also identified in 1/1358 non-cancer control individuals and in 0/57 cases, in a study looking at cancer predisposition mutations in patients with cutaneous melanoma and a history of at least two additional non-cutaneous melanoma primary cancers (Pritchard AL et al. PLoS One, 2018 Apr;13:e0194098). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 30, 2019This missense variant replaces threonine with isoleucine at codon 522 of the CDH1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been performed for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has been identified in 2/251328 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMar 14, 2023Variant summary: CDH1 c.1565C>T (p.Thr522Ile) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Cadherin-like domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.4e-05 in 276562 control chromosomes (gnomAD and publications). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1565C>T has been reported in the literature in an individual affected with nonsyndromic oral clefts (Ittiwu_2016) and an individual affected with ichthyosis vulgaris and atopic dermatitis (Taylan_2015). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance (n=3) or likely benign/benign (n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 12, 2021In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; Observed in individuals with oral clefts, ichthyosis vulgaris or atopic dermatitis (Taylan 2015, Ittiwat 2016); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31638429, 30287823, 19593635, 25819062, 27227907, 29641532) -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 03, 2023The NM_004360.5(CDH1): c.1565C>T (p.Thr522Ile) variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). This variant was observed in the homozygous state in 1 individual without personal and/or family history of DGC, LBC, or SRC tumors (BP2_strong; internal laboratory contributors). This variant is known in one family with HDGC criteria (ERN_GENTURIS). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as benign based on BS2 and BP2_strong. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS2, BP2_strong. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 06/26/2023) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.16
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.49
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.48
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.46
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.86
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.84
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.010
T
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.68
D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.70
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
M;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.40
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.4
D;.;.;.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.31
Sift
Benign
0.097
T;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.072
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.98
D;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.75
MutPred
0.60
Gain of methylation at K520 (P = 0.0461);Gain of methylation at K520 (P = 0.0461);.;Gain of methylation at K520 (P = 0.0461);.;
MVP
0.92
MPC
0.49
ClinPred
0.89
D
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.11
gMVP
0.42

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.10
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.22
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs863224725; hg19: chr16-68849662; COSMIC: COSV55739315; COSMIC: COSV55739315; API