Menu
GeneBe

16-68819398-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1684A>G(p.Thr562Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000217 in 1,613,698 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T562P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000022 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:4B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.84
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 4 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 2 benign, 17 uncertain in NM_004360.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.16087088).
BP6
Variant 16-68819398-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68819398-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 141854.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1684A>G p.Thr562Ala missense_variant 11/16 ENST00000261769.10
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1501A>G p.Thr501Ala missense_variant 10/15
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.136A>G p.Thr46Ala missense_variant 11/16
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-254-2603A>G intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1684A>G p.Thr562Ala missense_variant 11/161 NM_004360.5 P1P12830-1
ENST00000563916.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.264-3739T>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152194
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000119
AC:
3
AN:
251490
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000736
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135920
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000219
AC:
32
AN:
1461504
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000165
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
727044
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000270
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152194
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74350
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000227
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:6
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMar 11, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 06, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 27, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 25, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jun 28, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 25, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 26, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 28, 2018- -
CDH1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 30, 2023The CDH1 c.1684A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Thr562Ala. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.0062% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/16-68853301-A-G). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 03, 2023The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1684A>G (p.Thr562Ala) variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS2. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 06/26/2023) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.081
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.29
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
Cadd
Benign
13
Dann
Benign
0.93
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.27
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.45
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.48
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.60
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.53
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.021
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.16
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
M;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.4
N;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.044
Sift
Benign
0.23
T;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.42
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.011
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.45
MutPred
0.54
Gain of catalytic residue at T562 (P = 0.0346);Gain of catalytic residue at T562 (P = 0.0346);.;Gain of catalytic residue at T562 (P = 0.0346);.;
MVP
0.78
MPC
0.26
ClinPred
0.15
T
GERP RS
3.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.039
gMVP
0.33

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.12
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587782061; hg19: chr16-68853301; API