16-68829701-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):ā€‹c.2343A>Gā€‹(p.Glu781=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 6.8e-7 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.551
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 16-68829701-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68829701-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 184599.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.551 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.2343A>G p.Glu781= synonymous_variant 15/16 ENST00000261769.10
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2160A>G p.Glu720= synonymous_variant 14/15
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.795A>G p.Glu265= synonymous_variant 15/16
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.378A>G p.Glu126= synonymous_variant 14/15

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.2343A>G p.Glu781= synonymous_variant 15/161 NM_004360.5 P1P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
6.84e-7
AC:
1
AN:
1461872
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
8.99e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 12, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 19, 2017This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 29, 2019Variant summary: CDH1 c.2343A>G alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 4/5 computational tools via ALAMUT predict that the variant could impact normal splicing by creating or strengthening a cryptic exonic 5' donor site. Another in-silico tool for assessing the pathogenicity of synonymous variants, namely TraP (Transcript-inferred Pathogenicity, Gelfman_2017) predicts this variant to be possibly pathogenic. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant was absent in 251468 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.2343A>G in individuals affected with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating the variant's impact on protein function have been reported. Four other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar (evaluation after 2014): Three laboratories cited the variant as likely benign and one laboratory cited the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 06, 2023- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 09, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
CADD
Benign
9.3
DANN
Benign
0.58

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587780119; hg19: chr16-68863604; API