16-70265040-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The ENST00000261772.13(AARS1):​c.1410C>T​(p.Ile470=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000142 in 1,614,120 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000092 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

AARS1
ENST00000261772.13 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.560
Variant links:
Genes affected
AARS1 (HGNC:20): (alanyl-tRNA synthetase 1) The human alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AARS) belongs to a family of tRNA synthases, of the class II enzymes. Class II tRNA synthases evolved early in evolution and are highly conserved. This is reflected by the fact that 498 of the 968-residue polypeptide human AARS shares 41% identity witht the E.coli protein. tRNA synthases are the enzymes that interpret the RNA code and attach specific aminoacids to the tRNAs that contain the cognate trinucleotide anticodons. They consist of a catalytic domain which interacts with the amino acid acceptor-T psi C helix of the tRNA, and a second domain which interacts with the rest of the tRNA structure. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 16-70265040-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-70265040-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 320342.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.56 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000092 (14/152252) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00174 (9/5178). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000907. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 10 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
AARS1NM_001605.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1410C>T p.Ile470= synonymous_variant 11/21 ENST00000261772.13 NP_001596.2
AARS1XM_047433666.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1410C>T p.Ile470= synonymous_variant 11/16 XP_047289622.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
AARS1ENST00000261772.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.1410C>T p.Ile470= synonymous_variant 11/211 NM_001605.3 ENSP00000261772 P1P49588-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000920
AC:
14
AN:
152134
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000402
AC:
101
AN:
251468
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000390
AC XY:
53
AN XY:
135912
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00386
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000784
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000879
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000147
AC:
215
AN:
1461868
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000175
AC XY:
127
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00232
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000974
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000719
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000447
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000920
AC:
14
AN:
152252
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000134
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00174
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.000215
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00289
AC:
10
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 11, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpNov 24, 2021- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 11, 2018- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2N Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Benign
4.0
DANN
Benign
0.83

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs79785372; hg19: chr16-70298943; API