16-71536831-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_001166395.2(CHST4):c.154C>A(p.Arg52Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000195 in 1,540,496 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R52C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001166395.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001166395.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHST4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.154C>A | p.Arg52Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000441204.3 | Q8NCG5 | ||
| CHST4 | TSL:4 | c.154C>A | p.Arg52Ser | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000341206.5 | Q8NCG5 | ||
| CHST4 | c.154C>A | p.Arg52Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000536651.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000103 AC: 2AN: 193874 AF XY: 0.00000981 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000144 AC: 2AN: 1388308Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000293 AC XY: 2AN XY: 682330 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74342 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at