16-72021211-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_001361.5(DHODH):c.605G>A(p.Gly202Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000546 in 1,611,664 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G202A) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001361.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- postaxial acrofacial dysostosisInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHODH | NM_001361.5 | c.605G>A | p.Gly202Asp | missense_variant | Exon 5 of 9 | ENST00000219240.9 | NP_001352.2 | |
DHODH | XM_047433674.1 | c.521G>A | p.Gly174Asp | missense_variant | Exon 5 of 9 | XP_047289630.1 | ||
DHODH | XM_005255829.5 | c.176G>A | p.Gly59Asp | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 7 | XP_005255886.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152172Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000372 AC: 9AN: 242182 AF XY: 0.0000456 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000548 AC: 80AN: 1459374Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000689 AC XY: 50AN XY: 725742 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000525 AC: 8AN: 152290Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74460 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Miller syndrome Pathogenic:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at