16-74740097-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_024306.5(FA2H):c.289C>G(p.Pro97Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00852 in 1,613,458 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 166 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024306.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hereditary spastic paraplegia 35Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_024306.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA2H | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.289C>G | p.Pro97Ala | missense | Exon 2 of 7 | ENSP00000219368.3 | Q7L5A8-1 | ||
| FA2H | c.289C>G | p.Pro97Ala | missense | Exon 2 of 7 | ENSP00000558411.1 | ||||
| FA2H | c.289C>G | p.Pro97Ala | missense | Exon 2 of 7 | ENSP00000558410.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0194 AC: 2950AN: 152100Hom.: 64 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00954 AC: 2399AN: 251494 AF XY: 0.00858 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00739 AC: 10792AN: 1461240Hom.: 101 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00723 AC XY: 5257AN XY: 726976 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0194 AC: 2958AN: 152218Hom.: 65 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0183 AC XY: 1364AN XY: 74438 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at