16-81356881-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_022041.4(GAN):​c.730A>G​(p.Ile244Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000814 in 1,613,890 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00054 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00084 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

GAN
NM_022041.4 missense

Scores

1
3
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.04

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GAN (HGNC:4137): (gigaxonin) This gene encodes a member of the cytoskeletal BTB/kelch (Broad-Complex, Tramtrack and Bric a brac) repeat family. The encoded protein plays a role in neurofilament architecture and is involved in mediating the ubiquitination and degradation of some proteins. Defects in this gene are a cause of giant axonal neuropathy (GAN). [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
GAN Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • giant axonal neuropathy 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in the gene, where a lot of missense mutations are associated with disease in ClinVar. The gene has 11 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 3 curated benign missense variants. Trascript score misZ: -2.0288 (below the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to giant axonal neuropathy 1.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.035799414).
BP6
Variant 16-81356881-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-81356881-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 157527.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000539 (82/152252) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00104 (5/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000729. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 47 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GANNM_022041.4 linkc.730A>G p.Ile244Val missense_variant Exon 4 of 11 ENST00000648994.2 NP_071324.1
GANNM_001377486.1 linkc.91A>G p.Ile31Val missense_variant Exon 3 of 10 NP_001364415.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GANENST00000648994.2 linkc.730A>G p.Ile244Val missense_variant Exon 4 of 11 NM_022041.4 ENSP00000497351.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000539
AC:
82
AN:
152134
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000911
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000585
AC:
147
AN:
251490
AF XY:
0.000581
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000260
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000905
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000814
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000843
AC:
1232
AN:
1461638
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000791
AC XY:
575
AN XY:
727162
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000209
AC:
7
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000224
AC:
10
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000661
AC:
57
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000300
AC:
16
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00347
AC:
20
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000971
AC:
1080
AN:
1111782
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000696
AC:
42
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
63
125
188
250
313
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
42
84
126
168
210
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000539
AC:
82
AN:
152252
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000631
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
74448
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
8
AN:
41528
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000392
AC:
6
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
5
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000911
AC:
62
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000821
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.000472
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00104
AC:
4
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000465
AC:
4
ExAC
AF:
0.000634
AC:
77
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00131
EpiControl
AF:
0.00166

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Giant axonal neuropathy 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Dec 28, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jun 01, 2017
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 16, 2024
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Uncertain:1
Nov 01, 2013
Dept. of Medical Genetics, Telemark Hospital Trust, Telemark Hospital Trust
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Jan 02, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.51
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.17
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.10
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.14
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.86
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.0
.;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0033
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.036
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.78
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.34
N;N
PhyloP100
5.0
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.57
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.0
.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.0
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.98
T;.
Vest4
0.38
ClinPred
0.030
T
GERP RS
5.8
Varity_R
0.61
gMVP
0.17
Mutation Taster
=90/10
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200749953; hg19: chr16-81390486; API