16-84155693-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_178452.6(DNAAF1):c.685C>T(p.His229Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000929 in 1,614,114 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00084 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00094 ( 32 hom. )

Consequence

DNAAF1
NM_178452.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.93

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAAF1 (HGNC:30539): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is cilium-specific and is required for the stability of the ciliary architecture. It is involved in the regulation of microtubule-based cilia and actin-based brush border microvilli. Mutations in this gene are associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia-13. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

DNAAF1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014607459).

BP6

Variant 16-84155693-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-84155693-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 262957.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000841 (128/152220) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0222 (115/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0189. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 72 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAAF1	NM_178452.6 link	c.685C>T	p.His229Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 12	ENST00000378553.10	NP_848547.4	Q8NEP3-1A0A140VJN4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAAF1	ENST00000378553.10 link	c.685C>T	p.His229Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 12	1	NM_178452.6	ENSP00000367815.5	Q8NEP3-1
DNAAF1	ENST00000567918.5 link	n.685C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 5 of 7	1		ENSP00000455154.1	H3BP51
DNAAF1	ENST00000563093.5 link	n.685C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 5 of 11	2		ENSP00000457373.1	Q8NEP3-3
DNAAF1	ENST00000570298.5 link	n.839C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 5 of 11	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000842

AC:

128

AN:

152102

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0221

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00194

AC:

487

AN:

251496

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00203

AC XY:

276

AN XY:

135922

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0237

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00127

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000977

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000939

AC:

1372

AN:

1461894

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00102

AC XY:

743

AN XY:

727248

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000447

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000765

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0284

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00187

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000719

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00119

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000841

AC:

128

AN:

152220

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000967

AC XY:

AN XY:

74424

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0222

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.00125

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00102

ExAC

AF:

0.00209

AC:

254

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00722

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:2

Apr 09, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 13

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.16

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.57

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.57

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.025

Eigen

Benign

-0.088

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.00098

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.85

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.91

MetaRNN

Benign

0.015

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.1

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.54

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-4.6

REVEL

Benign

0.054

Sift

Benign

0.079

Sift4G

Benign

0.22

Polyphen

0.23

Vest4

0.45

MVP

0.32

MPC

0.030

ClinPred

0.046

GERP RS

3.1

Varity_R

0.24

gMVP

0.71

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over