16-84169911-C-T

Position:

chr16-84169911-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_178452.6(DNAAF1):c.1083C>T(p.Gly361Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000299 in 1,614,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DNAAF1
NM_178452.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.979

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAAF1 (HGNC:30539): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is cilium-specific and is required for the stability of the ciliary architecture. It is involved in the regulation of microtubule-based cilia and actin-based brush border microvilli. Mutations in this gene are associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia-13. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

DNAAF1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).

BP6

Variant 16-84169911-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-84169911-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 320771.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=2}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.979 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000307 (449/1461788) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000397 (441/1112008). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000365. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 221 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAAF1	NM_178452.6 link	c.1083C>T	p.Gly361Gly	synonymous_variant	8/12	ENST00000378553.10	NP_848547.4	Q8NEP3-1A0A140VJN4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNAAF1	ENST00000378553.10 link	c.1083C>T	p.Gly361Gly	synonymous_variant	8/12	1	NM_178452.6	ENSP00000367815.5		Q8NEP3-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000217

AC:

AN:

152224

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000179

AC:

AN:

251426

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000191

AC XY:

AN XY:

135918

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000387

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000307

AC:

449

AN:

1461788

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000304

AC XY:

221

AN XY:

727192

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000374

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000397

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000828

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000217

AC:

AN:

152342

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74504

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000721

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000360

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000204

EpiCase

AF:

0.000600

EpiControl

AF:

0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Nov 10, 2023	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Sep 01, 2022	The c.1083C>T variant (also known as p.G361G), located in coding exon 8 of the DNAAF1 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 1083. This nucleotide substitution does not change the glycine at codon 361. This nucleotide position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 13

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Jul 01, 2022

DNAAF1: BP4, BP7 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.81

CADD

Benign

2.6

DANN

Benign

0.39

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.15

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over