16-88438442-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001367624.2(ZNF469):​c.10972G>C​(p.Glu3658Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.412 in 1,549,886 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 134,381 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E3658?) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.43 ( 14845 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.41 ( 119536 hom. )

Consequence

ZNF469
NM_001367624.2 missense

Scores

1
16

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0480
Variant links:
Genes affected
ZNF469 (HGNC:23216): (zinc finger protein 469) This gene encodes a zinc-finger protein. Low-percent homology to certain collagens suggests that it may function as a transcription factor or extra-nuclear regulator factor for the synthesis or organization of collagen fibers. Mutations in this gene cause brittle cornea syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=4.0975698E-5).
BP6
Variant 16-88438442-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-88438442-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 321020.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-88438442-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.519 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ZNF469NM_001367624.2 linkc.10972G>C p.Glu3658Gln missense_variant Exon 3 of 3 ENST00000565624.3 NP_001354553.1
ZNF469XM_047434810.1 linkc.10972G>C p.Glu3658Gln missense_variant Exon 4 of 4 XP_047290766.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ZNF469ENST00000565624.3 linkc.10972G>C p.Glu3658Gln missense_variant Exon 3 of 3 6 NM_001367624.2 ENSP00000456500.2 H3BS19
ZNF469ENST00000437464.1 linkc.10888G>C p.Glu3630Gln missense_variant Exon 2 of 2 5 ENSP00000402343.1 Q96JG9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.435
AC:
66044
AN:
151960
Hom.:
14804
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.524
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.536
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.355
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.404
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.241
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.459
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.419
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.359
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.373
AC:
54523
AN:
146310
Hom.:
10749
AF XY:
0.364
AC XY:
28626
AN XY:
78620
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.529
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.318
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.298
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.420
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.235
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.459
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.415
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.345
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.409
AC:
571778
AN:
1397808
Hom.:
119536
Cov.:
95
AF XY:
0.404
AC XY:
278240
AN XY:
689390
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.530
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.323
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.295
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.381
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.236
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.455
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.425
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.381
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.435
AC:
66134
AN:
152078
Hom.:
14845
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.432
AC XY:
32069
AN XY:
74318
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.525
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.355
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.403
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.242
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.459
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.419
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.355
Alfa
AF:
0.408
Hom.:
4155
Bravo
AF:
0.429
TwinsUK
AF:
0.422
AC:
1566
ALSPAC
AF:
0.444
AC:
1710
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.533
AC:
729
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.415
AC:
1311
ExAC
AF:
0.315
AC:
6601
Asia WGS
AF:
0.328
AC:
1141
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Brittle cornea syndrome 1 Benign:4
Jan 15, 2016
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

not specified Benign:1
Sep 29, 2016
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 04, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.096
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.77
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.51
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0074
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.72
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.78
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.033
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.51
T;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.000041
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
PrimateAI
Benign
0.22
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.82
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.040
Sift
Benign
0.043
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.022
D;D
Vest4
0.022
ClinPred
0.0025
T
GERP RS
1.3
gMVP
0.030

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1105066; hg19: chr16-88504850; COSMIC: COSV71258359; API