16-88653337-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_002461.3(MVD):c.1085C>T(p.Pro362Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000156 in 1,600,368 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002461.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- porokeratosis 7, multiple typesInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002461.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MVD | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1085C>T | p.Pro362Leu | missense | Exon 9 of 10 | ENSP00000301012.3 | P53602 | ||
| MVD | TSL:1 | n.1644C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 5 of 6 | |||||
| MVD | c.1205C>T | p.Pro402Leu | missense | Exon 10 of 11 | ENSP00000569681.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000290 AC: 68AN: 234806 AF XY: 0.000335 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000159 AC: 230AN: 1448176Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000190 AC XY: 137AN XY: 720748 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74354 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at