16-89101274-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 14 ACMG points: 14P and 0B. PM2PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_001243279.3(ACSF3):c.593T>G(p.Met198Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000687 in 1,601,830 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001243279.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 151884Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000345 AC: 5AN: 1449946Hom.: 0 Cov.: 89 AF XY: 0.00000278 AC XY: 2AN XY: 720178
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 151884Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74184
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Combined malonic and methylmalonic acidemia Pathogenic:3
- -
Variant summary: ACSF3 c.593T>G (p.Met198Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the AMP-dependent synthetase/ligase domain (IPR000873) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 224322 control chromosomes (gnomAD). c.593T>G has been reported in the literature in two homozygous individuals affected with Combined Malonic And Methylmalonic Aciduria (Sloan_2011, Kuster_2018). These data indicate that the variant is likely to be associated with disease. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 28924877, 21841779). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 31141). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely pathogenic. -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at