16-8963255-TCTG-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2
The NM_003470.3(USP7):c.28_30delCAG(p.Gln10del) variant causes a conservative inframe deletion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00109 in 1,363,576 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003470.3 conservative_inframe_deletion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000268 AC: 4AN: 149172Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00122 AC: 1482AN: 1214320Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00129 AC XY: 772AN XY: 598308
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000268 AC: 4AN: 149256Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000137 AC XY: 1AN XY: 72888
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
This variant, c.28_30del, results in the deletion of 1 amino acid(s) of the USP7 protein (p.Gln10del), but otherwise preserves the integrity of the reading frame. The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with USP7-related conditions. Experimental studies and prediction algorithms are not available or were not evaluated, and the functional significance of this variant is currently unknown. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
USP7-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at