17-10639154-T-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_002470.4(MYH3):​c.3138A>C​(p.Arg1046Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.675 in 1,613,870 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 379,828 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R1046R) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.57 ( 27831 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.69 ( 351997 hom. )

Consequence

MYH3
NM_002470.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -6.14

Publications

25 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH3 (HGNC:7573): (myosin heavy chain 3) Myosin is a major contractile protein which converts chemical energy into mechanical energy through the hydrolysis of ATP. Myosin is a hexameric protein composed of a pair of myosin heavy chains (MYH) and two pairs of nonidentical light chains. This gene is a member of the MYH family and encodes a protein with an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain. Mutations in this gene have been associated with two congenital contracture (arthrogryposis) syndromes, Freeman-Sheldon syndrome and Sheldon-Hall syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
MYHAS (HGNC:50609): (myosin heavy chain gene cluster antisense RNA) Predicted to enable primary miRNA binding activity. Predicted to be involved in response to muscle activity and skeletal muscle fiber development. Predicted to act upstream of or within with a positive effect on gene expression. Predicted to be located in cytoplasm and nucleus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 17-10639154-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-10639154-T-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129656.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-6.14 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.728 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002470.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MYH3
NM_002470.4
MANE Select
c.3138A>Cp.Arg1046Arg
synonymous
Exon 25 of 41NP_002461.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MYH3
ENST00000583535.6
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.3138A>Cp.Arg1046Arg
synonymous
Exon 25 of 41ENSP00000464317.1
MYHAS
ENST00000579914.2
TSL:4
n.705+25277T>G
intron
N/A
MYHAS
ENST00000584139.2
TSL:3
n.1041+25277T>G
intron
N/A

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.573
AC:
87102
AN:
151978
Hom.:
27825
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.295
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.743
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.561
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.703
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.371
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.523
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.707
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.547
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.734
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.591
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.610
AC:
153443
AN:
251460
AF XY:
0.622
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.294
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.467
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.708
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.362
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.715
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.728
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.653
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.686
AC:
1002239
AN:
1461770
Hom.:
351997
Cov.:
65
AF XY:
0.684
AC XY:
497631
AN XY:
727190
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.277
AC:
9261
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.480
AC:
21460
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.705
AC:
18413
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.368
AC:
14611
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.539
AC:
46511
AN:
86248
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.720
AC:
38466
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.557
AC:
3211
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.729
AC:
810900
AN:
1111914
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.653
AC:
39406
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.482
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18344
36688
55031
73375
91719
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
19712
39424
59136
78848
98560
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.573
AC:
87135
AN:
152100
Hom.:
27831
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.568
AC XY:
42222
AN XY:
74348
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.295
AC:
12226
AN:
41488
American (AMR)
AF:
0.561
AC:
8573
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.703
AC:
2441
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.372
AC:
1926
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.522
AC:
2514
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.707
AC:
7478
AN:
10574
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.544
AC:
160
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.734
AC:
49887
AN:
67990
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.595
AC:
1254
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1645
3289
4934
6578
8223
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
724
1448
2172
2896
3620
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.685
Hom.:
64939
Bravo
AF:
0.547
Asia WGS
AF:
0.465
AC:
1621
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.730
EpiControl
AF:
0.724

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Nov 12, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Freeman-Sheldon syndrome Benign:2
Sep 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Arthrogryposis, distal, type 2B3 Benign:1
Sep 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Contractures, pterygia, and variable skeletal fusions syndrome 1B Benign:1
Sep 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Freeman-Sheldon syndrome;C1867440:Contractures, pterygia, and spondylocarpotarsal fusion syndrome 1A;C5193098:Arthrogryposis, distal, type 2B3;C5193114:Contractures, pterygia, and variable skeletal fusions syndrome 1B Benign:1
Aug 11, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Distal arthrogryposis type 2B1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Contractures, pterygia, and spondylocarpotarsal fusion syndrome 1A Benign:1
Sep 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.91
CADD
Benign
0.20
DANN
Benign
0.61
PhyloP100
-6.1
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2285475; hg19: chr17-10542471; COSMIC: COSV56861471; API