17-10697492-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_004589.4(SCO1):āc.16C>Gā(p.Leu6Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00605 in 1,613,454 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 44 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004589.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCO1 | NM_004589.4 | c.16C>G | p.Leu6Val | missense_variant | 1/6 | ENST00000255390.10 | NP_004580.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCO1 | ENST00000255390.10 | c.16C>G | p.Leu6Val | missense_variant | 1/6 | 1 | NM_004589.4 | ENSP00000255390.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00380 AC: 578AN: 152224Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00363 AC: 902AN: 248192Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00368 AC XY: 497AN XY: 134936
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00629 AC: 9190AN: 1461112Hom.: 41 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00619 AC XY: 4500AN XY: 726826
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00379 AC: 578AN: 152342Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00387 AC XY: 288AN XY: 74498
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Feb 22, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The SCO1 p.Leu6Val variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs61753148), ClinVar (reported as benign, likely benign and uncertain significance), Clinvitae, MutDB and LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 1015 of 279580 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.00363 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 818 of 126916 chromosomes (freq: 0.006445), Other in 25 of 7176 chromosomes (freq: 0.003484), Latino in 93 of 35346 chromosomes (freq: 0.002631), African in 39 of 24464 chromosomes (freq: 0.001594), South Asian in 26 of 30522 chromosomes (freq: 0.000852), European (Finnish) in 10 of 25074 chromosomes (freq: 0.000399), East Asian in 3 of 19798 chromosomes (freq: 0.000152), and Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10284 chromosomes (freq: 0.000097). The p.Leu6 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, and MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Aug 19, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | SCO1: BP4, BS2 - |
Mitochondrial complex IV deficiency, nuclear type 1 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 08, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 01, 2023 | Variant summary: SCO1 c.16C>G (p.Leu6Val) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0036 in 248192 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. c.16C>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Mitochondrial Complex 4 Deficiency without evidence for causality (e.g. McCormack_2016, Kumps_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Mitochondrial Complex 4 Deficiency, Nuclear Type 4. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 33340101; Book Chapter: doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800877-5.00021-8). Four ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: one classified the variant as uncertain significance, two as likely benign, and one as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Leigh syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at