17-10704939-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_020233.5(ADPRM):c.13C>A(p.Pro5Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000686 in 1,603,028 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P5S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020233.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_020233.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADPRM | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.13C>A | p.Pro5Thr | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | ENSP00000369099.4 | Q3LIE5-1 | ||
| ADPRM | TSL:1 | n.13C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 4 | ENSP00000431622.1 | Q3LIE5-3 | |||
| ADPRM | c.13C>A | p.Pro5Thr | missense | Exon 3 of 5 | ENSP00000565445.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152152Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000165 AC: 4AN: 242840 AF XY: 0.0000304 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000689 AC: 10AN: 1450876Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000832 AC XY: 6AN XY: 721534 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152152Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74322 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at