Menu
GeneBe

17-14069638-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001303.4(COX10):c.33C>T(p.Arg11=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0663 in 1,613,798 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,999 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.054 ( 291 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.068 ( 3708 hom. )

Consequence

COX10
NM_001303.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.20
Variant links:
Genes affected
COX10 (HGNC:2260): (cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor heme A:farnesyltransferase COX10) Cytochrome c oxidase (COX), the terminal component of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, catalyzes the electron transfer from reduced cytochrome c to oxygen. This component is a heteromeric complex consisting of 3 catalytic subunits encoded by mitochondrial genes and multiple structural subunits encoded by nuclear genes. The mitochondrially-encoded subunits function in electron transfer, and the nuclear-encoded subunits may function in the regulation and assembly of the complex. This nuclear gene encodes heme A:farnesyltransferase, which is not a structural subunit but required for the expression of functional COX and functions in the maturation of the heme A prosthetic group of COX. This protein is predicted to contain 7-9 transmembrane domains localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. A gene mutation, which results in the substitution of a lysine for an asparagine (N204K), is identified to be responsible for cytochrome c oxidase deficiency. In addition, this gene is disrupted in patients with CMT1A (Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A) duplication and with HNPP (hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies) deletion. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).
BP6
Variant 17-14069638-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-14069638-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137005.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.2 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.073 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
COX10NM_001303.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.33C>T p.Arg11= synonymous_variant 1/7 ENST00000261643.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
COX10ENST00000261643.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.33C>T p.Arg11= synonymous_variant 1/71 NM_001303.4 P1Q12887-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0542
AC:
8242
AN:
152168
Hom.:
291
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00548
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0434
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0542
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0280
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0373
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.129
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0747
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0546
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0589
AC:
14639
AN:
248538
Hom.:
557
AF XY:
0.0602
AC XY:
8105
AN XY:
134632
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0269
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0572
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0308
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0408
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.131
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0715
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0639
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0675
AC:
98720
AN:
1461512
Hom.:
3708
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0670
AC XY:
48693
AN XY:
727062
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00917
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0289
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0590
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0258
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0405
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.133
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0720
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0623
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0541
AC:
8240
AN:
152286
Hom.:
291
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0557
AC XY:
4148
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0434
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0542
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0279
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0371
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.129
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0747
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0540
Alfa
AF:
0.0636
Hom.:
417
Bravo
AF:
0.0448
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0310
AC:
109
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0668
EpiControl
AF:
0.0665

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicFeb 23, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 30, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Mitochondrial complex IV deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.41
Cadd
Benign
12
Dann
Benign
0.80
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs8076787; hg19: chr17-13972955; COSMIC: COSV55402628; COSMIC: COSV55402628; API