17-14159926-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_ModeratePP5_Moderate
The ENST00000261643.8(COX10):c.674C>T(p.Pro225Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000105 in 1,612,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P225R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000261643.8 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COX10 | NM_001303.4 | c.674C>T | p.Pro225Leu | missense_variant | 5/7 | ENST00000261643.8 | NP_001294.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COX10 | ENST00000261643.8 | c.674C>T | p.Pro225Leu | missense_variant | 5/7 | 1 | NM_001303.4 | ENSP00000261643 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152018Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000120 AC: 3AN: 249950Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000740 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135050
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000959 AC: 14AN: 1460222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000138 AC XY: 10AN XY: 726362
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74374
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Mitochondrial complex 4 deficiency, nuclear type 3 Pathogenic:2
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Oct 15, 2003 | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Jan 31, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at