17-16948968-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_012452.3(TNFRSF13B):​c.215G>A​(p.Arg72His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00357 in 1,614,006 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0026 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0037 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

TNFRSF13B
NM_012452.3 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.12
Variant links:
Genes affected
TNFRSF13B (HGNC:18153): (TNF receptor superfamily member 13B) The protein encoded by this gene is a lymphocyte-specific member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily. It interacts with calcium-modulator and cyclophilin ligand (CAML). The protein induces activation of the transcription factors NFAT, AP1, and NF-kappa-B and plays a crucial role in humoral immunity by interacting with a TNF ligand. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008713514).
BP6
Variant 17-16948968-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-16948968-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 322027.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-16948968-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00257 (391/152164) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00462 (314/68012). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0042. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 168 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TNFRSF13BNM_012452.3 linkc.215G>A p.Arg72His missense_variant Exon 3 of 5 ENST00000261652.7 NP_036584.1 O14836-1Q4ACX1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TNFRSF13BENST00000261652.7 linkc.215G>A p.Arg72His missense_variant Exon 3 of 5 1 NM_012452.3 ENSP00000261652.2 O14836-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00257
AC:
391
AN:
152046
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000701
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000378
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00462
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00202
AC:
507
AN:
251186
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00185
AC XY:
251
AN XY:
135754
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000800
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00182
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000894
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000370
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00345
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00244
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00368
AC:
5376
AN:
1461842
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00346
AC XY:
2519
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000508
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00210
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000689
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000581
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00450
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00328
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00257
AC:
391
AN:
152164
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00226
AC XY:
168
AN XY:
74386
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000699
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000378
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00462
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.00352
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00251
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00458
AC:
17
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00545
AC:
21
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00465
AC:
40
ExAC
AF:
0.00172
AC:
209
EpiCase
AF:
0.00327
EpiControl
AF:
0.00320

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:8
-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

TNFRSF13B: PM5, BS2 -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 24, 2020
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 26, 2018
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18981294, 17392797, 16007087, 17983875, 17464555, 22884984, 26122175, 17392798, 32581362) -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

not specified Benign:1
Aug 04, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: TNFRSF13B c.215G>A (p.Arg72His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the TACI, cysteine-rich domain (IPR015384) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0022 in 394334 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0038 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database (v2.1 exomes dataset, and v3 genomes dataset), including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is considerably higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TNFRSF13B causing Common Variable Immunodeficiency (CVID) phenotype, strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. The variant, c.215G>A, also has been reported in the literature (in heterozygous and compound heterozygous state) in individuals affected with Common Variable Immunodeficiency, but has also been observed in unaffected individuals and family members (e.g. Salzer_2005, Freiberger_2012, Pulvirenti_2016). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Common Variable Immunodeficiency. The variant was found at frequencies comparable in CVID patient cohorts and healthy controls in multiple case-control studies (e.g. Salzer_2009, van Schouwenburg_2015) and in a meta-analysis of cases and controls from the literature (Freiberger_2012). A publication reported experimental evidence and demonstrated decreased production of IgG and IgA after APRIL stimulation of B cells derived from a patient carrying the variant in heterozygous state. However, in this study B cells of subjects with CVID but no TNFRSF13B mutations were at least as dysfunctional as B cells of subjects with CVID, who had monoallelic- or biallelic TNFRSF13B mutations; therefore, this study doesn't allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect (Zhang_2007). Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Immunodeficiency, common variable, 2 Benign:1
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Common Variable Immune Deficiency, Dominant Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Immunoglobulin A deficiency 2;C3150354:Immunodeficiency, common variable, 2 Benign:1
Jul 15, 2022
Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant has been reported in the literature in several individuals with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) as well as in at least 2 individuals with antibody deficiency (Salzer 2005 PMID:16007087, Pan-Hammarstrom 2007 PMID:17392797, Zhang 2007 PMID:179838875, Freiberger 2012 PMID:22884984, Turro 2020 PMID:32581362, Rojas-Restrepo 2021 PMID:34975878). Of note, multiple publications list this variant as a polymorphism. This variant is present in the Genome Aggregation Database (Highest reported MAF 0.4% (314/68020) including 2 homozygotes (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-16948968-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r3). This variant is present in ClinVar, with several labs classifying this variant as likely benign (Variation ID:322027). This variant amino acid Histidine (His) is present in several species including multiple mammals and is not well conserved among evolutionarily distant species; this suggests that this variant may not impact the protein. Additional computational prediction tools do not suggest an impact. In summary, data on this variant suggests that this variant does not cause disease but requires further evidence. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.086
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.17
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.010
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Benign
0.63
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.36
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.6
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.7
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.046
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.72
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.025
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0087
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.26
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.11
.;N;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.090
.;N;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.50
Sift
Benign
0.31
.;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.22
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0030, 0.0020
.;B;B
Vest4
0.19
MVP
0.32
MPC
0.013
ClinPred
0.0068
T
GERP RS
-9.9
Varity_R
0.054
gMVP
0.19

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55916807; hg19: chr17-16852282; API