17-17793024-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP3BS2
The NM_030665.4(RAI1):c.76C>T(p.Arg26Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000118 in 1,614,036 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R26H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_030665.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAI1 | NM_030665.4 | c.76C>T | p.Arg26Cys | missense_variant | 3/6 | ENST00000353383.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAI1 | ENST00000353383.6 | c.76C>T | p.Arg26Cys | missense_variant | 3/6 | 1 | NM_030665.4 | P1 | |
RAI1 | ENST00000395774.1 | c.76C>T | p.Arg26Cys | missense_variant | 2/2 | 2 | |||
RAI1 | ENST00000471135.2 | c.76C>T | p.Arg26Cys | missense_variant | 4/4 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251262Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000368 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135872
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000109 AC: 16AN: 1461870Hom.: 0 Cov.: 43 AF XY: 0.0000124 AC XY: 9AN XY: 727234
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74324
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Dec 21, 2023 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 26 of the RAI1 protein (p.Arg26Cys). This variant is present in population databases (rs376964045, gnomAD 0.005%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RAI1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 1234029). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt RAI1 protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 03, 2020 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Sep 13, 2017 | - - |
RAI1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 27, 2023 | The RAI1 c.76C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg26Cys. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.0046% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-17696338-C-T). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at