17-18119509-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.709G>A(p.Asp237Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000187 in 1,611,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00090 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MYO15A
NM_016239.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.41

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

MYO15A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

MYO15A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011123389).

BP6

Variant 17-18119509-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18119509-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 504628.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0009 (137/152188) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00318 (132/41534). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00274. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 63 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYO15A	NM_016239.4 link	c.709G>A	p.Asp237Asn	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 66	ENST00000647165.2	NP_057323.3	Q9UKN7-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MYO15A	ENST00000647165.2 link	c.709G>A	p.Asp237Asn	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 66		NM_016239.4	ENSP00000495481.1		Q9UKN7-1
MYO15A	ENST00000583079.1 link	n.342G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 1	6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000901

AC:

137

AN:

152070

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00319

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000958

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000256

AC:

AN:

246546

AF XY:

0.000216

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00354

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000232

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000167

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000112

AC:

164

AN:

1459796

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000923

AC XY:

AN XY:

726256

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00400

AC:

134

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000224

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

51384

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

8.99e-7

AC:

AN:

1111986

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000315

AC:

AN:

60370

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.491

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000900

AC:

137

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000847

AC XY:

AN XY:

74394

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00318

AC:

132

AN:

41534

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5156

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4818

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

67980

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000948

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000290

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00105

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00262

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000289

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Mar 17, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 27, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Uncertain:1

Aug 07, 2024

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The c.709G>A (p.D237N) alteration is located in exon 2 (coding exon 1) of the MYO15A gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 709, causing the aspartic acid (D) at amino acid position 237 to be replaced by an asparagine (N). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Aug 24, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Asp237Asn in exon 2 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 0.3% (32/9332) of African chromoso mes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; d bSNP rs201737186). -

MYO15A-related disorder

Benign:1

Aug 16, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.40

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.34

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.26

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.029

T;T;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.41

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.45

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.87

LIST_S2

Benign

0.78

T;.;T

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.19

MetaRNN

Benign

0.011

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.57

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.1

.;L;L

PhyloP100

4.4

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.64

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.4

.;N;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.40

Sift

Benign

0.11

.;T;.

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D;.

Polyphen

0.96

.;P;P

Vest4

0.42

MVP

0.87

ClinPred

0.017

GERP RS

5.5

Varity_R

0.10

gMVP

0.80

Mutation Taster

=70/30

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over