17-18119715-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):​c.915C>T​(p.Tyr305Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000777 in 1,611,586 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00058 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00080 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

MYO15A
NM_016239.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.422
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 17-18119715-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18119715-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 226792.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}. Variant chr17-18119715-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.422 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MYO15ANM_016239.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.915C>T p.Tyr305Tyr synonymous_variant 2/66 ENST00000647165.2 NP_057323.3 Q9UKN7-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO15AENST00000647165.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.915C>T p.Tyr305Tyr synonymous_variant 2/66 NM_016239.4 ENSP00000495481.1 Q9UKN7-1
MYO15AENST00000583079.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.548C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/16

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000579
AC:
88
AN:
152084
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00658
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00490
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00331
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000603
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00123
AC:
301
AN:
245544
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00147
AC XY:
197
AN XY:
134148
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000673
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00550
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00530
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000295
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000574
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000666
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000798
AC:
1165
AN:
1459384
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.000938
AC XY:
681
AN XY:
726128
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000201
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00486
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00539
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000216
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000445
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000861
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000578
AC:
88
AN:
152202
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000565
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
74394
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00490
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00332
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000603
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000851
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000484
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000927
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 22, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 21, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenDec 01, 2022MYO15A: BP4, BP7, BS2 -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineAug 27, 2015p.Tyr305Tyr in exon 2 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located w ithin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.49% (81/16474) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exa c.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs200695102). -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
6.4
DANN
Benign
0.88

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200695102; hg19: chr17-18023029; COSMIC: COSV52757851; API