17-18119715-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):​c.915C>T​(p.Tyr305Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000777 in 1,611,586 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00058 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00080 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

MYO15A
NM_016239.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.422

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
MYO15A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 17-18119715-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18119715-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 226792.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.422 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000798 (1165/1459384) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00539 (465/86258). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00499. There are 9 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 681 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 36. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO15ANM_016239.4 linkc.915C>T p.Tyr305Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 66 ENST00000647165.2 NP_057323.3 Q9UKN7-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO15AENST00000647165.2 linkc.915C>T p.Tyr305Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 66 NM_016239.4 ENSP00000495481.1 Q9UKN7-1
MYO15AENST00000583079.1 linkn.548C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 1 6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000579
AC:
88
AN:
152084
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00658
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00490
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00331
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000603
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00123
AC:
301
AN:
245544
AF XY:
0.00147
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000673
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00550
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000295
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000574
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000666
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000798
AC:
1165
AN:
1459384
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.000938
AC XY:
681
AN XY:
726128
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000299
AC:
1
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000201
AC:
9
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00486
AC:
127
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00539
AC:
465
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000216
AC:
11
AN:
50966
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000867
AC:
5
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000445
AC:
495
AN:
1111986
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000861
AC:
52
AN:
60372
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
98
196
293
391
489
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000578
AC:
88
AN:
152202
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000565
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
74394
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000482
AC:
2
AN:
41532
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000196
AC:
3
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00490
AC:
17
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5154
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00332
AC:
16
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000189
AC:
2
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000603
AC:
41
AN:
67992
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5
10
14
19
24
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000851
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000484
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000927
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Jan 22, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2022
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MYO15A: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

Oct 22, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 27, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Tyr305Tyr in exon 2 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located w ithin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.49% (81/16474) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exa c.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs200695102). -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
6.4
DANN
Benign
0.88
PhyloP100
-0.42
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200695102; hg19: chr17-18023029; COSMIC: COSV52757851; API