Menu
GeneBe

17-18121940-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.3140C>G(p.Pro1047Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00405 in 1,613,412 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P1047H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0072 ( 9 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0037 ( 20 hom. )

Consequence

MYO15A
NM_016239.4 missense

Scores

1
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.701
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0052706897).
BP6
Variant 17-18121940-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18121940-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 226783.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00716 (1090/152274) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0163 (677/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0153. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 529 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 6 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO15ANM_016239.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3140C>G p.Pro1047Arg missense_variant 2/66 ENST00000647165.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO15AENST00000647165.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.3140C>G p.Pro1047Arg missense_variant 2/66 NM_016239.4 P1Q9UKN7-1
MYO15AENST00000583079.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.2773C>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00699
AC:
1063
AN:
152156
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00232
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00352
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00447
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00766
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00353
AC:
879
AN:
249180
Hom.:
4
AF XY:
0.00347
AC XY:
470
AN XY:
135278
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000199
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000890
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00324
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00153
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00298
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00373
AC:
5451
AN:
1461138
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
44
AF XY:
0.00373
AC XY:
2710
AN XY:
726868
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0167
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000806
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00337
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00167
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00370
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00427
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00716
AC:
1090
AN:
152274
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00711
AC XY:
529
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0163
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00274
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00232
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00373
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00447
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0114
Alfa
AF:
0.00170
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00743
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00216
AC:
8
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00259
AC:
10
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0152
AC:
60
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00432
AC:
36
ExAC
AF:
0.00386
AC:
467
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0180
AC:
64
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00387
EpiControl
AF:
0.00367

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 12, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 21, 2015p.Pro1047Arg in exon 2 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 1.6% (159/9738) of European chrom osomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org ; dbSNP rs77565048). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.092
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.44
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
Cadd
Benign
11
Dann
Benign
0.78
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.011
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.18
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.35
T;.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0053
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.77
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0090
D;D;.
Polyphen
0.23
.;B;B
Vest4
0.15
MVP
0.45
ClinPred
0.028
T
GERP RS
2.5
Varity_R
0.054
gMVP
0.28

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs77565048; hg19: chr17-18025254; API