17-18131224-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.4039-15C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000685 in 1,459,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016239.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYO15A | NM_016239.4 | c.4039-15C>T | intron_variant | Intron 8 of 65 | ENST00000647165.2 | NP_057323.3 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYO15A | ENST00000647165.2 | c.4039-15C>T | intron_variant | Intron 8 of 65 | NM_016239.4 | ENSP00000495481.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1459054Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726036 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
4039-15C>T variant in intron 8 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have c linical significance because a C>T change at this position does not diverge from the splice consensus and is therefore unlikely to impact splicing. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at