17-28741115-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_178170.3(NEK8):c.1770C>T(p.His590His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000286 in 1,614,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00038 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00028 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

NEK8
NM_178170.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.666

Publications

6 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NEK8 (HGNC:13387): (NIMA related kinase 8) This gene encodes a member of the serine/threionine protein kinase family related to NIMA (never in mitosis, gene A) of Aspergillus nidulans. The encoded protein may play a role in cell cycle progression from G2 to M phase. Mutations in the related mouse gene are associated with a disease phenotype that closely parallels the juvenile autosomal recessive form of polycystic kidney disease in humans. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

NEK8 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Ambry Genetics
autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen
nephronophthisis 9
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
polycystic kidney disease 8
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
nephronophthisis 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

NEK8 links:

ENSG00000265073 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000265073 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).

BP6

Variant 17-28741115-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-28741115-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 262929.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.666 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000381 (58/152268) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0108 (56/5180). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00855. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 29 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NEK8	NM_178170.3 link	c.1770C>T	p.His590His	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 15	ENST00000268766.11	NP_835464.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein
NEK8	ENST00000268766.11 link	c.1770C>T	p.His590His	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 15	1	NM_178170.3	ENSP00000268766.6
NEK8	ENST00000543014.1 link	n.*119-384C>T		intron_variant	Intron 9 of 10	2		ENSP00000465859.1
ENSG00000265073	ENST00000584779.1 link	n.417+1234G>A		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1	5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000381

AC:

AN:

152150

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0108

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000887

AC:

223

AN:

251458

AF XY:

0.000795

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0107

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000276

AC:

404

AN:

1461862

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000292

AC XY:

212

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000383

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00736

AC:

292

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000626

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53396

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000378

AC:

AN:

1112010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000232

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.483

Heterozygous variant carriers

126

157

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000381

AC:

AN:

152268

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000389

AC XY:

AN XY:

74468

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41552

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15302

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0108

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.494

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000754

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000540

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00433

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Nephronophthisis 9

Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Jun 03, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.46

CADD

Benign

3.5

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.85

PhyloP100

-0.67

Mutation Taster

=94/6

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over