17-30971395-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000328381.10(RNF135):āc.322T>Cā(p.Ser108Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0425 in 1,522,404 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17,157 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000328381.10 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNF135 | NM_032322.4 | c.322T>C | p.Ser108Pro | missense_variant | 1/5 | ENST00000328381.10 | NP_115698.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNF135 | ENST00000328381.10 | c.322T>C | p.Ser108Pro | missense_variant | 1/5 | 1 | NM_032322.4 | ENSP00000328340 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.200 AC: 30338AN: 152032Hom.: 9551 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0339 AC: 3896AN: 114962Hom.: 679 AF XY: 0.0303 AC XY: 1941AN XY: 63954
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0250 AC: 34240AN: 1370264Hom.: 7575 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0233 AC XY: 15787AN XY: 676426
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.200 AC: 30414AN: 152140Hom.: 9582 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.193 AC XY: 14382AN XY: 74384
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 21, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at