17-31223532-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):​c.1810T>C​(p.Leu604Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00197 in 1,612,762 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

NF1
NM_001042492.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.29
Variant links:
Genes affected
NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 17-31223532-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31223532-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184133.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-31223532-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-31223532-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.29 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 175 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
NF1NM_001042492.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1810T>C p.Leu604Leu synonymous_variant 16/58 ENST00000358273.9 NP_001035957.1 P21359-1
NF1NM_000267.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1810T>C p.Leu604Leu synonymous_variant 16/57 NP_000258.1 P21359-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NF1ENST00000358273.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1810T>C p.Leu604Leu synonymous_variant 16/581 NM_001042492.3 ENSP00000351015.4 P21359-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00115
AC:
175
AN:
152208
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000314
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000471
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00197
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00138
AC:
345
AN:
250850
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00132
AC XY:
179
AN XY:
135724
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000436
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000869
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00586
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000416
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00206
AC:
3009
AN:
1460436
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00194
AC XY:
1408
AN XY:
726578
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000179
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00529
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000656
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00246
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00141
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00115
AC:
175
AN:
152326
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000980
AC XY:
73
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00576
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000471
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00197
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00203
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00114
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.00191
EpiControl
AF:
0.00213

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 07, 2018Variant summary: NF1 c.1810T>C alters a conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0013 in 276866 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.006 within the Ashkenazi Jewish subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Ashkenazi Jewish control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 29 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in NF1 causing Neurofibromatosis Type 1 phenotype (0.00021), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Ashkenazi Jewish origin. c.1810T>C has been reported in the literature in an individual affected with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (Griffiths_2006). This report does not provide an unequivocal conclusion about association of the variant with Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (NF1 c.2433_2456del22), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Seven ClinVar submissions from other clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as benign/likely benign (6x) and once as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJan 09, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoOct 19, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineOct 10, 2017p.Leu604Leu in exon 16 of NF1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.2% (143/66480) o f European chromosomes and in 0.6% (61/10146) of Ashkenazi Jewish chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomAD.broadinstitute.org; dbSN P rs142712751). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2024NF1: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 12, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 20, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15060124, 16944272) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabMar 15, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 24, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Oct 07, 2020- -
NF1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesOct 25, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Neurofibromatosis, type 1;C0349639:Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia;C0553586:Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis;C1834235:Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal;C2931482:Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsApr 11, 2022- -
Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 08, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
6.9
DANN
Benign
0.80
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142712751; hg19: chr17-29550550; COSMIC: COSV104420510; COSMIC: COSV104420510; API