17-31225243-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):​c.1994C>T​(p.Ser665Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000355 in 1,613,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

NF1
NM_001042492.3 missense

Scores

6
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:21O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.37
Variant links:
Genes affected
NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), NF1. . Gene score misZ 6.5427 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 8.4054 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with neurofibromatosis, familial spinal, hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma, neurofibromatosis type 1, Watson syndrome, neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome, Moyamoya disease, familial ovarian cancer.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0058389306).
BP6
Variant 17-31225243-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31225243-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 134881.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=15, Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1}. Variant chr17-31225243-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 299 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
NF1NM_001042492.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1994C>T p.Ser665Phe missense_variant 17/58 ENST00000358273.9 NP_001035957.1 P21359-1
NF1NM_000267.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1994C>T p.Ser665Phe missense_variant 17/57 NP_000258.1 P21359-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NF1ENST00000358273.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1994C>T p.Ser665Phe missense_variant 17/581 NM_001042492.3 ENSP00000351015.4 P21359-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00198
AC:
301
AN:
152098
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00688
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000602
AC:
151
AN:
250986
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000310
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
135654
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00831
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000434
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000188
AC:
274
AN:
1461304
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000146
AC XY:
106
AN XY:
726972
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00646
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000380
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000540
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000431
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00196
AC:
299
AN:
152216
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00179
AC XY:
133
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00681
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.000375
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00217
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00658
AC:
29
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000733
AC:
89
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:21Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Uncertain:1Benign:6
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsMay 31, 2018This variant is interpreted as a Uncertain Significance - Insufficient Evidence, for Neurofibromatosis 1, in Autosomal Dominant manner. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BS1 => Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenOct 26, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJul 02, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMedical Genetics, University of ParmaAug 17, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaNov 20, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, IncNov 01, 2016- -
not specified Benign:4Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 11, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 07, 2015p.Ser665Phe in exon 17 of NF1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 0.8% (81/10324) of African chromosom es by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; db SNP rs145891889). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 03, 2020- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 30, 2019Variant summary: NF1 c.1994C>T (p.Ser665Phe) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00074 in 282364 control chromosomes, predominantly within the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0077 in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 37-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in NF1 causing Neurofibromatosis Type 1 phenotype (0.00021), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. However, this region is affected by pseudogene interference therefore these population frequency data need to be cautiously considered. c.1994C>T has been reported in the literature in an affected individual (Fahsold 2000). This report however does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Neurofibromatosis Type 1. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight ClinVar submissions from other clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant predominantly as likely benign/benign (7x) and once as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoApr 28, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenSep 01, 2024NF1: BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 05, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10712197, 24803665, 15060124, 24728327, 27322474, 23771920, 28371134, 26154128, 33562071) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jul 31, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 09, 2015In silico models in agreement (benign);Other data supporting benign classification;Subpopulation frequency in support of benign classification -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Nov 15, 2022- -
Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaNov 20, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaNov 20, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaNov 20, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 26, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.36
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.29
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.45
T;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.21
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.028
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.80
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.086
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0058
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.0
L;L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.97
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.58
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.93
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.24
Sift
Benign
0.032
D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.22
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;.
Vest4
0.82
MVP
0.80
MPC
0.77
ClinPred
0.038
T
GERP RS
4.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.072
gMVP
0.34

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145891889; hg19: chr17-29552261; COSMIC: COSV62199685; COSMIC: COSV62199685; API