17-31225243-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.1994C>T(p.Ser665Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000355 in 1,613,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

NF1
NM_001042492.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:22O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.37

Variant links:

Genes affected

NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

NF1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

PP2

Missense variant in the NF1 gene, where missense mutations are typically associated with disease (based on misZ statistic). The gene has 399 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 143 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: 6.5427 (above the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 8.4054 (above the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to neurofibromatosis, familial spinal, hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma, neurofibromatosis type 1, Watson syndrome, neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome, Moyamoya disease, familial ovarian cancer.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0058389306).

BP6

Variant 17-31225243-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31225243-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 134881.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=16, Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1}. Variant chr17-31225243-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00196 (299/152216) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00681 (283/41544). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00616. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 133 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 299 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NF1	NM_001042492.3 link	c.1994C>T	p.Ser665Phe	missense_variant	Exon 17 of 58	ENST00000358273.9	NP_001035957.1	P21359-1
NF1	NM_000267.3 link	c.1994C>T	p.Ser665Phe	missense_variant	Exon 17 of 57		NP_000258.1	P21359-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NF1	ENST00000358273.9 link	c.1994C>T	p.Ser665Phe	missense_variant	Exon 17 of 58	1	NM_001042492.3	ENSP00000351015.4		P21359-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00198

AC:

301

AN:

152098

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00688

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000393

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000602

AC:

151

AN:

250986

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000310

AC XY:

AN XY:

135654

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00831

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000434

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000188

AC:

274

AN:

1461304

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000146

AC XY:

106

AN XY:

726972

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00646

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000380

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000348

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000540

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000431

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00196

AC:

299

AN:

152216

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00179

AC XY:

133

AN XY:

74424

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00681

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000393

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00237

Alfa

AF:

0.000375

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00217

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00658

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000733

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:22Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neurofibromatosis, type 1

Uncertain:1Benign:7

Aug 17, 2022

Medical Genetics, University of Parma

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 26, 2020

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2016

Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 02, 2018

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 20, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

May 31, 2018

SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

This variant is interpreted as a Uncertain Significance - Insufficient Evidence, for Neurofibromatosis 1, in Autosomal Dominant manner. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BS1 => Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder. -

not specified

Benign:4Other:1

Jan 30, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: NF1 c.1994C>T (p.Ser665Phe) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00074 in 282364 control chromosomes, predominantly within the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0077 in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 37-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in NF1 causing Neurofibromatosis Type 1 phenotype (0.00021), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. However, this region is affected by pseudogene interference therefore these population frequency data need to be cautiously considered. c.1994C>T has been reported in the literature in an affected individual (Fahsold 2000). This report however does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Neurofibromatosis Type 1. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight ClinVar submissions from other clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant predominantly as likely benign/benign (7x) and once as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Apr 07, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Ser665Phe in exon 17 of NF1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 0.8% (81/10324) of African chromosom es by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; db SNP rs145891889). -

May 11, 2016

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2020

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Apr 28, 2017

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

NF1: BS1, BS2 -

May 05, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10712197, 24803665, 15060124, 24728327, 27322474, 23771920, 28371134, 26154128, 33562071) -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Jul 31, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Nov 15, 2022

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 09, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico models in agreement (benign);Other data supporting benign classification;Subpopulation frequency in support of benign classification -

Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal

Benign:2

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 20, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome

Benign:1

Nov 20, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis

Benign:1

Nov 20, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Apr 26, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.12

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.36

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.29

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.45

T;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.21

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.028

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.80

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.87

D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.086

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0058

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.0

L;L;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.58

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.93

N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.24

Sift

Benign

0.032

D;D;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.22

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;B;.

Vest4

0.82

MVP

0.80

MPC

0.77

ClinPred

0.038

GERP RS

4.3

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.072

gMVP

0.34

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over