17-31226505-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 16 ACMG points: 16P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_ModeratePP5_Very_Strong
The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.2072T>C(p.Leu691Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L691R) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001042492.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- neurofibromatosis type 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
- Moyamoya diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary pheochromocytoma-paragangliomaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Pathogenic:3
PM2_Supporting+PM5_Supporting+PP3+PP2+PS4_Supporting+PP4 -
This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 691 of the NF1 protein (p.Leu691Pro). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with neurofibromatosis type 1 and/or NF1-related conditions (PMID: 31776437; internal data). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 429016). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt NF1 protein function with a positive predictive value of 95%. In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. -
- -
not provided Pathogenic:1
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23913538, 31776437, Kam and Yac-Kpeli[article], 25486365) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Pathogenic:1
The p.L691P variant (also known as c.2072T>C), located in coding exon 18 of the NF1 gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 2072. The leucine at codon 691 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration was identified in a cohort of 427 Korean patients with a confirmed or suspected clinical diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1 (Kang E et al. J Hum Genet, 2020 Jan;65:79-89). This alteration has been observed in multiple individuals with features of NF1-related disease (Ambry internal data). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. This variant is considered to be rare based on population cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Based on the supporting evidence, this variant is interpreted as a disease-causing mutation. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at