17-31229819-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.2851-16T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0192 in 1,611,400 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 348 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001042492.3 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- neurofibromatosis type 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
- Moyamoya diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary pheochromocytoma-paragangliomaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NF1 | ENST00000358273.9 | c.2851-16T>C | intron_variant | Intron 21 of 57 | 1 | NM_001042492.3 | ENSP00000351015.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0151 AC: 2299AN: 152208Hom.: 28 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0172 AC: 4301AN: 250782 AF XY: 0.0173 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0196 AC: 28611AN: 1459074Hom.: 320 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0193 AC XY: 14026AN XY: 725854 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0151 AC: 2301AN: 152326Hom.: 28 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0144 AC XY: 1071AN XY: 74494 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
not provided Benign:4
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Variant summary: The NF1 c.2851-16T>C variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. This variant was found in 2130/121080 control chromosomes (29 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the European (Non-Finnish), subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0253362 (1688/66624). This frequency is about 122 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic NF1 variant (0.0002084), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Non-Finnish) descent. In addition, the variant of interest was found to co-occur with known pathogenic mutation, c.3528delA (p.L1183*) in NF1 gene in a patient with a clinical diagnosis of neurofibromatosis. Taken together, based on the prevalence in general population, this variant was classified as Benign.
Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Benign:3
Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Benign:1
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at