Menu
GeneBe

17-31232853-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):​c.3468C>T​(p.Asn1156=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00123 in 1,613,894 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00081 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

NF1
NM_001042492.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:22

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.66
Variant links:
Genes affected
NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 17-31232853-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31232853-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184364.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-31232853-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-31232853-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 123 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
NF1NM_001042492.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.3468C>T p.Asn1156= synonymous_variant 26/58 ENST00000358273.9
NF1NM_000267.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.3468C>T p.Asn1156= synonymous_variant 26/57

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
NF1ENST00000358273.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.3468C>T p.Asn1156= synonymous_variant 26/581 NM_001042492.3 P1P21359-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000810
AC:
123
AN:
151932
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000411
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000190
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000700
AC:
176
AN:
251322
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000714
AC XY:
97
AN XY:
135818
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000369
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000868
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000199
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00136
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00128
AC:
1866
AN:
1461844
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00131
AC XY:
952
AN XY:
727222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000358
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000134
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000220
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00158
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000960
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000809
AC:
123
AN:
152050
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000619
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
74328
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000410
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000190
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00125
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000839
EpiCase
AF:
0.00164
EpiControl
AF:
0.00130

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:22
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenOct 26, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabMar 15, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesAug 21, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024NF1: BS1 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 08, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26216301) -
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 10, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoNov 09, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 28, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Mar 30, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 09, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jun 07, 2021- -
Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
NF1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesDec 01, 2023This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
1.8
DANN
Benign
0.71
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.25
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DL_spliceai
0.25
Position offset: 28

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147955381; hg19: chr17-29559871; COSMIC: COSV104662171; COSMIC: COSV104662171; API