17-31260464-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 4P and 2B. PM1PP3_ModerateBP6BS2_Supporting
The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.4526G>A(p.Arg1509His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000075 in 1,613,740 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1509C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001042492.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000592 AC: 9AN: 152054Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000107 AC: 27AN: 251282 AF XY: 0.000110 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000766 AC: 112AN: 1461686Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000784 AC XY: 57AN XY: 727156 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000592 AC: 9AN: 152054Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000539 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74258 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3
- -
- -
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in an individual with cafe-au-lait macules in published literature who had a different genetic etiology for the phenotype (Koczkowska 2018); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22675565, 26919320, 29290338, 30613976, 22807134) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
- -
in silico models in agreement (deleterious) and/or completely conserved position in appropriate species;Insufficient or Conflicting Evidence -
- -
Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
This sequence change does not appear to have been previously described in patients with NF1-related disorders and has been described in the gnomAD database with a low population frequency of 0.015% in the non-Finnish subpopulation (dbSNP rs546073780). The p.Arg1488His change affects a highly conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the NF1 protein that is known to be functional. In-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL) provide contradictory results for the p.Arg1488His substitution. Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Arg1488His change remains unknown at this time. -
Neurofibromatosis, type 1;C0349639:Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia;C0553586:Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis;C1834235:Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal;C2931482:Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Uncertain:1
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Neurofibromatosis, type 1;C0553586:Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis;C2931482:Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Other:1
Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 11-21-2018 by Lab Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at