17-31336607-TAA-TAAA
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.6148-17dupA variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.262 in 1,430,912 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22,083 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). There are indicators that this mutation may affect the branch point..
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001042492.3 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- neurofibromatosis type 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
- Moyamoya diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary pheochromocytoma-paragangliomaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001042492.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NF1 | NM_001042492.3 | MANE Select | c.6148-17dupA | intron | N/A | NP_001035957.1 | |||
| NF1 | NM_000267.4 | c.6085-17dupA | intron | N/A | NP_000258.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NF1 | ENST00000358273.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.6148-28_6148-27insA | intron | N/A | ENSP00000351015.4 | |||
| NF1 | ENST00000356175.7 | TSL:1 | c.6085-28_6085-27insA | intron | N/A | ENSP00000348498.3 | |||
| NF1 | ENST00000579081.6 | TSL:1 | n.*1313-28_*1313-27insA | intron | N/A | ENSP00000462408.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.342 AC: 51029AN: 149214Hom.: 9270 Cov.: 0 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.255 AC: 35631AN: 139834 AF XY: 0.245 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.253 AC: 324037AN: 1281614Hom.: 12805 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.250 AC XY: 159018AN XY: 635266 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.342 AC: 51058AN: 149298Hom.: 9278 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.345 AC XY: 25114AN XY: 72804 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Variant summary: The NF1 c.6085-17dupA variant involves the alteration of an intronic nucleotide with 5/5 splice prediction tools calculating no significant effect on splicing, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 9674/35378 (758 homozygotes, 1/3, frequency: 0.2734468), which significantly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic NF1 variant of 1/4798 (0.0002084), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories. Therefore, taking all available lines of evidence into consideration, the variant of interest is classified as Benign.
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at